Love Island is a controversial topic—on a par with Brexit and political correctness. We all know that there are two different types of summer people: those who watch Love Island and those who don’t. Much to the joy of those who despise the TV reality show, Love Island will be cancelled this summer due to the coronavirus pandemic.
Last week, ITV’s head of studios Kevin Lygo said that although the show would not be filmed in Majorca, it could potentially be filmed in the UK and take place in Cornwall. He also added that if the show was to be aired, he would feel “uneasy” about it. Filming people kissing and hanging out in a group while the rest of the nation is being told to socially distance could certainly be perceived as insensitive.
Today, Lygo spoke again and announced: “We have tried every which way to make Love Island this summer but logistically it’s just not possible to produce it in a way that safeguards the well-being of everyone involved and that for us is the priority.” Summer 2020 is officially ruined.
Think about it, having no Love Island means no new weird terms that only you and your mates who watch the show can use all summer long. Remember ‘bev’? What about the ‘do bits society’, also called ‘DBS’? Sadly, we won’t get any this year.
We will also miss the typical characters that Love Island offers us every year. As much as we enjoy criticising them, we also secretly create some sort of bonds with them—we end up seeing personality traits that we can relate to in ourselves—with the exception of Curtis. No one was able to understand what was going on in his mind, and even less so when he was dancing.
The thing is, of course Love Island has many flaws. But even the show’s bad aspects are part of what makes it so good. Do you hate the toxic masculinity and toxic monogamy that it promotes as much as we do? Sure, but this problematic behaviour helps to open up more conversations about why it is wrong in the first place.
Love Island reflects our society: the bad, yes, but also the good. It compels us not to be so judgmental, and that’s one of the many things we will be missing this summer.
Whatever that means—more smooching, bad tan lines and blindingly white teeth? Lygo confirmed that Love Island will be back in 2021, saying: “We are very sorry for fans of the show but making it safely is our prime concern and Love Island will be back stronger than ever in 2021.”
In the meantime, let’s all try to enjoy this summer as much as we possibly can. Stuck indoors or not, without Love Island to accompany us through every evening, summer 2020 is bound to be tedious and dull. But look on the bright side, this will give you all the time you need to catch up on Netflix’s Too Hot to Handle.
Apparently, just like with grey hairs, if you cancel one TV reality show, two new ones replace it.
Last month, British MPs rejected plans for a 1p per garment fashion tax albeit our climate crisis. At the same time, a Missguided £1 bikini appeared on the market—something that should be beyond concerning for everyone. The U.K. has the highest consumption of fast fashion in the whole of Europe, with over a million tonnes of clothing ending up in landfills each year. So how much power do we as consumers really have when it comes to sustainability and why is this discussion still going on?
The swimsuit sold out promptly, with 1,000 bikinis dropping everyday on the brand’s website, which further raises the question of how it is possible to produce and retail an entire set for just £1, free delivery included. Missguided presented an official statement claiming the production cost was of a higher value to the retail cost, and that the bikini was a “gift” to their customers, in the name of “empowering women to look and feel good without breaking the bank”. Interestingly enough, 78 percent of the brand’s employees are female, yet, they are a 46 percent median wage gap between men and women. The brand ‘excuses’ itself on its website by claiming that this is due to “having more women than men” in lower paid positions, and fewer in higher ones. The lower paid positions include the factory ones, where workers often make as little as £3.50 an hour—contrasting with the U.K.’s minimum wage of £7.83 for over 25s.
Despite being one of the U.K.’s leading retail brands, according to the statistics conducted by the House of Commons, Missguided is also the least environmentally friendly, rejecting the use of recycled or organic materials in their products, clearly avoiding the Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals (ZDHC) programme as well as the sustainable clothing action plan. The government has the most power when it comes to regulating fast fashion, and yet, British MPs have rejected numerous regulations on the industry.
Many of these dismissals include the 1p per item tax to raise £35 million for clothing collection and sorting, the ban on incinerating or landfilling unsold stock, and even making a law requiring brands to publically release a modern slavery statement. In addition to this, the Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) has also urged to put lessons on designing, creating and repairing clothing into the school curriculum, as a means to end the era of ‘disposable clothing’ as well as for the MPs to explore a ‘sharing’ economy in which hiring and swapping would replace purchasing. The failure to implement these rules and regulations results in the continuation of unsustainable, disposable mass production, which ultimately affects the environmental crisis even further.
Marketing alone has so much power in influencing what the consumer chooses to buy, and fast fashion brands know this. The infamous swimsuit was advertised by last year’s Love Island contestant Ellie Brown, and being the official fashion sponsor of Love Island 2018, Missguided saw a 40 percent increase in sales. This year, another fast fashion brand, I Saw It First, secured a spot as the show’s official fashion partner, spending around £2 million on the partnership. With over 4.2 million viewers of Love Island’s first episode alone (57 percent appear to be 16-34 years old) the show has the ability to reach a huge number of potential consumers, and yet, it still decides to go for unethical brands.
Similarly, Emily Ratajkowski has recently launched a collection with Boohoo owned Nasty Gal, a brand known to be criticised for their mistreatment of workers while Kylie Jenner advertises for knock-off brand Fashion Nova via her Instagram with over 139.5 million followers. Celebrities and influencers make a conscious choice to promote these brands and in an age where Instagram seems to dictate all new trends, the choices they make allow us to feel a sense of relatability that we, too, can afford to dress like one of the Jenners. Although there is nothing wrong with that idea, influencers should also make a deliberate choice to promote more sustainable alternatives to their followers.
While it is the consumer who creates a demand for fast fashion, it’s unfair to entirely blame the consumer for the harmful environmental impacts or unethical working conditions of the industry. Of course, it’s true that spending £1 on a bikini could seem immensely appealing, but it is important to consider not only the impact this product will have on our planet, but also how the people who made it are affected by such low prices.
Affordable clothing is not only appealing but is essential too, and we consumers can help so much by simply buying less, shopping vintage or seeking other sustainable alternatives. Until the government or the brands alone begin regulating their carbon footprint, perhaps those with a platform should consider twice before encouraging impulse buying. Just putting it out there. In addition, Missguided has now changed the price of the bikini from £1 to £5—a feeble attempt at clearing their conscience or is selling a swimsuit for a literal pound not making enough profit? Either way, nice try.