Is it a one size fits all approach when it comes to separating the art from the artist?

By Tahmina Begum

Updated May 17, 2020 at 08:48 AM

Reading time: 2 minutes

810

J.K. Rowling is one of those authors who are beloved, in and outside of the Pottermore community. Her rising success from once being below the poverty line to being able to fall off the billionaire listings as a result of her numerous works and donations to charity is an inspiration for many.

Yet recently, her wokeness has been questioned. Rowling has tweeted more ‘inclusive’ details about the characters that failed to be mentioned in both the books and films. From tweeting in 2007 that she always thought Dumbledore was gay, to retroactively adding progressive layers to the Fantastic Beast collection while claiming these ideas were brewed twenty years ago, with the promise of representing everyone. In the past few months, Rowling has also been called out for contradictorily favouring TWERF (Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist) tweets.

Now unless you live under a rock with no 5G, you would have heard about Surviving R. Kelly, a documentary series focusing on the victims affected by musician R. Kelly. The tragic series reveals the grooming, severe mental, physical, emotional and financial abuse inflicted by Kelly towards girls starting around the ages of twelve and upwards, and the numerous court cases attempting to jail the accused predator.

Yet whenever the documentary trends across social media, in addition to victim shaming and blaming, many share their disgust for R. Kelly the person, but not for R. Kelly the artist and musician. In fact, his music has been streamed 16 percent more since the airing of the documentary, which some argued was out of intrigue by a new generation discovering his artistry and looking out for ‘clues’ but could also be attributed to the continuous clout further entertainment attention has drawn to the musician. 

So the question is, can we listen to ‘Ignition’ or ‘I Believe I Can Fly’ and just hate on R. Kelly, the person?

The answer is no. Emphasised especially through the #MeToo movement, where many accusations towards powerful men in Hollywood have come to the forefront of our public attention, separating the art from the artist has become a prominent conversation amidst the woke era. Though I personally don’t believe in cancel culture (where when a mistake has been made that person is to be written off), the difference between J.K. Rowling’s post woke patina and R. Kelly is still palpable.

What is always asked as an umbrella question has to be understood as a question that is not a one size fits all. The length of a person’s right for forgiveness and demand for cancellation is of course in direct ratio with their misconduct. J.K. Rowling has admitted to her learning curve towards inclusivity while still being called out to catch up about her TWERF comments while R. Kelly is yet to admit to his actions.

Regardless of your emotional connection to some of his chart hits, R. Kelly is to be cancelled. Separating the art from the artist is reductive when it comes to abusers because if we did not give our money, our attention and views to artists like R. Kelly, they quite simply would have no position to abuse.

Separating the art from the artist funds a lifestyle of sadistic and hedonistic choices; it supports the perpetuation of power. It can be difficult when songs, books and works of art hold such dear memories to us all. It can even be tough to see our iconic figures under a different light, but to differentiate the two comes down to our own moral compass and sometimes, the lines can be blurred. Frankly, though “I Believe I Can Fly” had its moment, it isn’t that good that I can ignore the havoc caused to those in mental chains and that won’t be soaring anytime soon.

Keep On Reading

By Charlie Sawyer

Is Rishi Sunak’s 4 July general election a strategic move to hit uni student voter turnout?

By J'Nae Phillips

Why Gen Z still turn to nature and the great outdoors for fashion inspo years after gorpcore’s rise

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

After becoming Elvis Presley, Austin Butler reveals why he couldn’t do method acting for Dune: Part 2

By Abby Amoakuh

Celebrity podcaster Bobbi Althoff comes forward as deepfake porn video of her goes viral

By Charlie Sawyer

Has hen do culture gone mad? TikTokers say bridal group chats give them financial anxiety

By Jack Ramage

We spoke to the viral Oompa Loompa girl about the Glasgow Willy Wonka experience

By Abby Amoakuh

New Brandy Melville HBO documentary paints CEO Silvio Marsan as super creepy

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Former Mormon reveals the secrets signs for identifying Church members based on appearance

By Charlie Sawyer

Watch Coldplay bring out Michael J. Fox in emotional moment at Glastonbury festival

By Charlie Sawyer

Why North West’s Lion King performance has made me team nepo baby

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

PrettyLittleThing’s chaotic open casting call event is the fast fashion brand’s latest exploitative venture

By Louis Shankar

Nex Benedict’s tragic death proves the US and UK have learnt nothing about inclusivity in schools

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

UK to criminalise deepfake pornography, regardless of creator’s intentions

By Charlie Sawyer

Shia LaBeouf’s Cannes Film Festival comeback confirms that if they lay low for long enough, the industry will forgive abusers

By Charlie Sawyer

Woman who claimed to be Madeleine McCann breaks silence months after DNA test

By Emma O'Regan-Reidy

How celebrity podcasts are influencing a new era of tabloid journalism

By Charlie Sawyer

An acoustic guitar and the first chords of Wonderwall aka every girl’s worst dating nightmare

By Alma Fabiani

All the terrifying AI videos made using OpenAI’s Sora so far

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

What does the US Supreme Court’s decision to abolish mass protests in three states mean for democracy?

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Dementia diagnosis for Trump? Experts weigh in as Anderson Clayton emerges as Biden’s secret weapon