Deep Dives Level Up Newsletters Saved Articles Challenges

How AOC’s sexual assault testimony highlights the fundamental flaws of the #MeToo movement

By Malavika Pradeep

Feb 3, 2021

COPY URL

On Monday night, US Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) took to Instagram live to share her traumatic experience at the Capitol Hill riots. In the live video, which has now been captioned ‘What happened at the Capitol’ and posted on her Instagram feed, Ocasio-Cortez recalled the afternoon of 6 January 2020 in vivid detail to an audience made of more than 100 thousand followers, claiming to have received calls to “move on” and even apologise in the wake of the insurrection. It was then that she equated theses claims to the “tactics of abusers,” further admitting to being a sexual assault survivor herself.

“These folks who are just trying to tell us to move on are just like pulling the page,” the congresswoman started, referring to the Republicans who opposed President Donald Trump’s impeachment and who are now trying to sweep the insurrection under the rug. “They’re using the same tactics of every other abuser who tells you to move on. They’re trying to tell us to move on without any accountability, without any truth-telling, or without confronting the extreme damage, loss of life and trauma.” Ocasio-Cortez ruled out these Republican tactics as “not just about a difference in political opinion” but “about basic humanity.”

Overwhelmed with emotions, the congresswoman added: “I’m a survivor of sexual assault, and I haven’t told many people that in my life.” She stated that the insurrection compounded her trauma and admitted to struggling with the idea of being believed as a survivor herself, “For so many people out thereif you have experienced any sort of traumajust the fact of recognising that and admitting it is already a huge step. Especially in a world where people are constantly trying to tell you that you didn’t experience what you experienced or that you’re lying.”

Without delving into the details of her sexual abuse, Ocasio-Cortez further commented from an “internalised” standpoint. “A lot of times you don’t want to believe it either,” she said, “You don’t want to think that happened to you. You don’t want to think that X person hurt you. You don’t want to admit that you were a person who has been abused and assaulted…because you don’t want to be ‘a victim’, right?”

Voir cette publication sur Instagram

Une publication partagée par Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@aoc)

The 90-minute live broadcast has widely been shared on social media, amassing over 4 million views on Instagram and Twitter. It has also left many disheartened and opening up about their own brush with assaults and manipulative tactics following all the trauma. Some reiterate the experience of witnessing their abusers escape justice while others stress on the fact that these abusers are part of our justice system.

While the internet was busy diagnosing the Republican party with Stockholm Syndrome for the second time, following the broadcast, journalist Michael Tracey decided to call out AOC and her claimsgarnering him tremendous backlash on Twitter.

Though Tracey later cleared out the ‘misunderstanding’, his tweet adds to a list of undesirable connotations subjected to the #MeToo movement, one majorly being uncertainty about the credibility of victims. False accusations, fabricated sexual assaults, ‘Not all men’ and ‘Men get raped too’ are fuel to this discussion, discouraging women from opening up for fear of not being believed.

The #MeToo movement first made global headlines in the wake of the Harvey Weinstein scandal, with AOC and Dylan Farrow’s allegations renewing the much-needed attention to the movement. And yet, years after the #MeToo movement’s first impact, women like AOC who finally take the incredibly brave decision to speak up about the sexual abuse they’ve been victims of are still second-guessed and mistrusted.

When will the world realise that the only way to uproot this massive social issue is to frame the discussion right and believe women when they talk? What will it take for us to understand that women ‘preparing’ for criticism after they’ve shared about their assault and trauma is not only inhuman but can only lead to more victimising?

In 2017, gal-dem wrote, “If we are to ever end sexual violence, it is vital that we create a climate in which victims can speak up—and be believed.” Back to 2021, and things haven’t evolved one bit…

Join our community, become a Screen Shot Pro member!

Here's what you'll get:

Level Up classes brought to you by your favourite creators

Access to weekly Challenges with big rewards from brands

Deep Dives on exclusive insights into industry professionals, movements and cultures

20% of all profits go directly into commissioning community members

How AOC’s sexual assault testimony highlights the fundamental flaws of the #MeToo movement


By Malavika Pradeep

Feb 3, 2021

COPY URL


#Metoo continues to advance, with tech and legislation right behind it

By Yair Oded

Sep 14, 2018

COPY URL

As the effort to tackle sexual harassment in the workplace gains steam, California has recently passed two bills that would prevent silencing sexual harassment victims. The bills, currently pending California Governor Jerry Brown’s signature, are both aimed at assisting men and women who seek justice after suffering sexual harassment by their co-workers or employers and protect them from binding confidential settlement agreements. Similar bills are currently circulating around legislatures in 16 states and have already been enshrined in law in Arizona, Maryland, New York, Tennessee, Vermont and Washington. While such pieces of legislation are certainly valuable, it remains unclear whether they pose a big enough deterrent to sexual harassment in the workplace and the silencing of victims.

There is no doubt that both bills constitute positive developments, and will hopefully encourage legislators elsewhere to adopt the same approach when it comes to protecting sexual harassment victims. That being said, it remains unlikely that such legal action is sufficient in combating sexual predators who seek to silence their victims. One issue is that bills adopted on the state level only protect victims within the boundaries of those states (currently a mere fraction of the entire country).

Bills of this type generally protect victims who have made the decision to come forward and hold their aggressors accountable; a step many are hesitant to take in the first place. This directly ties to a broader issue, which is the general failure of the political and justice systems to foster an environment in which sexual harassment is truly discouraged and in which victims feel sufficiently empowered to come forward and seek prosecution. When across the country politicians, legislators, and judges continuously weaken protections for women and members of the LGBTQ community, and place under doubt their right to their bodies and lifestyles, it becomes ingrained in the national psyche that they are, for lack of a better term, ‘fair game’. It therefore seems that serious gaps exist in the U.S. legal system when it comes to protection of sexual harassment victims and their ability to properly pursue their cases.

What, then, could fill in such gaps and provide an extra support to those seeking to come forward? The answer, perhaps not so shockingly, is tech. Numerous technological startups and innovations have been launched in recent years to support victims of sexual harassment, particularly in taking the first, arguably most daunting step, of coming forward. Stopit, which started as an app designated to assist victims of school bullying report their abuse, has now evolved into a tool for people to instantly and anonymously report abuse or harassment. The app currently operates within educational institutions, businesses, and government agencies. Callisto is an online sexual assault reporting platform, which operates across college campuses as well as various business industries. Through Callisto, victims may insert encrypted information regarding their harasser while their name and contact information remains private and confidential. The report is then decrypted by a Castillo Options Counselor (a lawyer), who provides support and practical information regarding the different legal paths victims may take to win justice. The app also provides a “Matching Escrow” service, which alerts the counsellors whenever two or more people were abused by the same individual, consequently helping identify (and hopefully prosecute) serial offenders.

This isn’t to downplay the role of laws and regulations in the fight against sexual harassment. The first bill passed in California, titled AB 3080, is set to outlaw confidential agreements in sexual harassment cases as well as prohibit mandatory arbitration agreements in employment contracts, both of which discourage many victims from pursuing their legal cases. The other bill, SB 820, would ban agreements that prohibit “disclosure of factual information” in sexual assault and discrimination settlements. Among other stipulations, the bill would allow the name of the victim to remain private but require that perpetrators’ names be made public, thus encouraging victims to come forward without fearing the consequential public recognition. According to Senator Connie M. Leyva, one of the bill’s sponsors, “Legislative approval of SB 820 sends a resounding message to victims that we will do all we can to make sure that their perpetrators are held accountable for their reprehensible actions.”

The introduction of these bills shows that the legal system is waking up to its duty by providing better protection for victims of sexual harassment. In the same breath, the flaws and limitations of the justice system in preventing such abuses and prosecuting perpetrators should be acknowledged, and technological advancements ought to be adopted to complement the legal tools available to victims.

#Metoo continues to advance, with tech and legislation right behind it


By Yair Oded

Sep 14, 2018

COPY URL