WhatsApp’s transformation into one of the most powerful tools for political PR

By Shira Jeczmien

Published Oct 11, 2018 at 01:45 PM

Reading time: 2 minutes

199

For me, WhatsApp group chats are associated with my mother having learned how to use emojis and to share YouTube videos of whichever health and wellbeing influencer she’s recently subscribed to. Or of my friends discussing dinner parties, bad dates and how rich Jeff Bezos is. Never had it occurred to me that this platform will be turned into one of the most powerful mediums for political PR.

The platform’s use for political marketing is a relatively new direction, which is reportedly taking grounds in the global south and particularly in rural communities where internet is only accessed through smartphones. A study by the non-profit organisation Technical Technology, which studies “the political and social role of technology in our lives”, showed that WhatsApp is now the primary medium for political marketing in countries in South Asia, Africa, and Latin America, with a stronghold in India and more recently, in Brazil.

Each WhatsApp group can be made up of a maximum of 256 individuals, allowing campaigners to freely and directly speak to a large group of people completely unregulated. No fact checking and no Facebook ‘trustworthy’ evaluation. Inside a WhatsApp group chat, campaigners and politicians can talk about whatever they wish and spur discussion on ideas, policies and promises that, inside this space, can take the form of uncensored hate speech. But more importantly, the immediacy of message delivery can create a feeling of urgency towards particular topics and a false sensation of community or even solidarity.

When I think about it it makes complete sense. Political PR is all about emotion; feeling like my views are shared with others and my ideology asserted. That same feeling of excitement when my friends are invited into a brand new WhatsApp group, sending each other messages, memes and voice recordings all at once and the urge to keep up with the conversation has been channeled into an extremely powerful political tool. If knocking on people’s doors is how signatures used to be collected in political campaigning then compiling lists of hundreds of personal phone numbers and targeting potential voters via text is the new medium for political persuasion.

The thing with using WhatsApp as a PR tool is that it is cheap. According to the study, “Databases are gathered by marketing experts and communication companies who bring their own database of consumers (from other marketing projects, not necessarily related to politics) and expand them from there.” There are of course workarounds the 256 people limits with automated systems used so that 1,000s of messages can be sent at once.

While social media platforms desperately (and somewhat unsuccessfully) trying to combat the spread of fake news and the use of the medium to generate misleading political engagement, campaigners and politicians operating in this arena have already moved far ahead with more direct, more powerful and more personal ways to directly communicate with potential voters. Considering the recent traumatic outcomes of social media tycoons (WhatsApp is owned by Facebook) claiming a role within the political arena, and considering the uncontrolled nature of these Whatsapp groups, it seems as though the phone-based method is set to bring a whole new dimension of propaganda to an already chaotic and over crammed political communication arena.

Keep On Reading

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

TV host Andy Cohen faces cancellation over substance abuse, harassment, and exploitation allegations at Bravo

By Abby Amoakuh

Democratic National Convention 2024: The Obamas bring the house down and Gus Walz proudly cries

By Emma O'Regan-Reidy

Will the underconsumption core TikTok trend change influencing for good?

By Charlie Sawyer

How Florida’s hurricanes could sway the presidential election. And what officials are doing to keep voters safe

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Is the Ask for Angela scheme a fraud? New shocking investigation exposes dangerous failings

By Charlie Sawyer

Why is the UK government’s early prison release scheme so controversial?

By Charlie Sawyer

If you think Sabrina Carpenter’s tour is inappropriate for young audiences, leave the kids at home

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

As faces of UK rioters are revealed, communities mobilise to stand against far-right violence

By Abby Amoakuh

Jenna Ortega deleted X after receiving pictures of nudes and underaged deepfake porn of herself

By Abby Amoakuh

Meet Laura and Becky, the women hunting and exposing cheaters live to thousands on TikTok

By Abby Amoakuh

Pregnant women in the US more likely to die from murder than complications, cancer, or accidents

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Unpacking the drama around the viral fake Crumbl Cookie pop-up in Australia

By Abby Amoakuh

Some US states are voting on slavery this November’s election

By Fleurine Tideman

Is the very demure, very mindful TikTok trend rife with misogyny or just silly, goofy fun?

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Who is Usha Vance? The divisive wife of Republican VP candidate JD Vance

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

German company launches first digital condom aiming to block non-consensual recording during sex?

By Charlie Sawyer

Rats in New York City officially have greater access to birth control than US citizens do

By Charlie Sawyer

Why are Gen Zers hijacking the candy salad TikTok trend to trauma dump?

By Charlie Sawyer

Vegan festival in New York compared to Fyre Festival by angry plant-based mobs

By Abby Amoakuh

What does 304 mean? We explain the secret code that’s breaking TikTok