Bridgerton fans on X accuse show of sidelining Simone Ashley and her character Kate Sharma

By Abby Amoakuh

Published Feb 20, 2025 at 01:11 PM

Reading time: 3 minutes

66135

Were Simone Ashley and her character Kate Sharma sidelined by the Bridgerton team? Many fans of the hit TV show seem to think so, arguing that the only leading lady of colour was snubbed of essential onscreen-time and off-screen promotion. The conversation around Ashley’s alleged mistreatment ties into longstanding debates about the portrayal of people of colour in the romance genre. Primarily that they are frequently desexualised or exoticized, often relegated to supporting roles rather than main ones.

When a new teaser for the fourth season of Bridgerton was released last week, fans were disappointed to see no sign of Kate in the clip, despite the fact that she has been confirmed for the upcoming series.

Given that Ashley’s character is the only meaningful one missing from the teaser, her absence immediately sparked a lot of heated discourse among fans of the show.

Shonda Rhimes’ Bridgerton has been praised for its inclusion of different ethnicities in the predominantly white historical romance space. By doing so, Rhimes was also able to highlight the way in which history has been white-washed, most remarkably through her portrayal of Queen Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz as a biracial woman, to highlight her African ancestry.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Bridgerton (@bridgertonnetflix)

Yet, the show also fell into the pitfalls of having a strong focus on interracial relationships. This led to accusations that Bridgerton presents a “colourblind narrative,” where it tries to ignore the complexities and nuances of race and identity, effectively erasing the background of its leads.

So it didn’t take long until a now-viral thread on X with over 1 million views outlined numerous instances where the team behind Bridgerton seemingly sidelined Ashley and her onscreen character.

“Here’s a list of instances where Bridgerton production has disrespected, excluded, sidelined or overlooked Simone Ashley and/ or her character, Kate Sharma, in a pattern of behaviour that seems to single her out among the other leads of previous, current and future seasons,” the introduction to the thread stated.

One part of the thread cited: “Simone Ashley confirmed her return to season 3 of Bridgerton back in 2022. Yet, when season 3 cast was officially announced by Netflix Tudum website months later, Simone was not included in the cast list. This would not be the only time where she is excluded from official announcements concerning upcoming seasons.”

The thread, started by user chrkrose, also pointed out that Ashley and her co-lead Bailey allegedly did not partake in promotional photoshoots or magazine covers like the other leading couples, nor did they sit down for joint interviews as a pair to discuss their characters’ love story.

@netflix

If Anthony was a colour, he'd be lilac. #Bridgerton #austok #netty

♬ original sound - Netflix - Netflix

Of course, the backlash intensified as the rest of the internet started to get wind of Ashley’s perceived mistreatment.

“Literally from day one Kate (now VISCOUNTESS BRIDGERTON mind you) has been denied the bare minimum afforded to every single other Bridgerton female romantic lead: promo solely with her love interest, a backstory, a wedding, a baby and now they’ve even denied her her married name,” one X user wrote.

While some disagreed with the reality or extent of Ashley’s treatment, especially considering that her career is currently flourishing, the ongoing discourse still seems essential to examine the complexities of representation and promotion in media.

It also highlights the need for consistent and equitable treatment of actors of colour in leading roles.

Keep On Reading

By Abby Amoakuh

Bridgerton event compared to Glasgow Willy Wonka experience after guests paid $250 for raw food

By Abby Amoakuh

Bridgerton’s Nicola Coughlan hits back at journalist who shamed her for nude scene

By Malavika Pradeep

Men have to buy the ring and women shouldn’t make the first move: introducing the ‘Romance Gap’

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Trump launches his 2028 presidential campaign, ignoring constitutional limitations

By Eliza Frost

Do artists really owe us surprise guests at gigs, or are our expectations out of control?

By Charlie Sawyer

From breaking up families to spreading rumours about Joe Biden’s death, here’s what QAnons been up to

By Eliza Frost

American Eagle and Sydney Sweeney face backlash with employee’s LinkedIn post adding fuel to the fire

By Abby Amoakuh

From dinner parties to grocery flexing: Inside Gen Z’s new language of luxury

By Eliza Frost

The Summer I Turned Pretty stars Lola Tung and Gavin Casalegno caught in political drama

By Eliza Frost

Kendall Jenner reveals plans to quit Kardashian fame for a normal job

By Charlie Sawyer

UK women who miscarry could face home and phone searches following new anti-abortion police guidance

By Charlie Sawyer

Former Harry Potter star tells reporters he doesn’t understand JK Rowling’s Twitter transphobia

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Could the next pope be Black? Peter Turkson’s papal bid could rewrite over 1,500 years of Vatican history

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Robert F. Kennedy Jr declares war on teen sperm count, stating it’s an existential crisis

By Charlie Sawyer

How influencer Liv Schmidt promotes toxic eating habits through the Skinni Société 

By Charlie Sawyer

Johnny Depp plays the victim once more and anoints himself crash test dummy for #MeToo

By Abby Amoakuh

John Lithgow fumbles JK Rowling question as Harry Potter TV show cast struggles with fan backlash

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Conspiracy theorists are convinced Blue Origin’s all-female space flight was fake

By Abby Amoakuh

Tiktoker gets slammed by dermatologists for promoting dangerous caveman skincare regime

By Abby Amoakuh

I sat down with two professional matchmakers to solve Gen Z’s dating fatigue