Mark Zuckerberg criticised as Meta allegedly censors abortion pill providers, raising Trump alliance fears

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Published Jan 31, 2025 at 01:40 PM

Reading time: 2 minutes

65569

In recent weeks Meta has escalated its war against abortion pill providers, blocking, blurring, and outright removing critical content from Instagram and Facebook. This aggressive clampdown, which reached a fever pitch over the last two days, has left healthcare providers scrambling to maintain any presence on the platforms. Posts detailing how to access abortion pills—crucial information for countless people seeking care—have suddenly vanished. In some cases, entire accounts have disappeared from the social media landscape.

While Meta has since reversed some of these actions, the timing raises serious questions. The company has been facing mounting pressure following CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s recent announcement regarding pursuing a “looser” stance on online speech. The billionaire’s promise to relax content moderation sparked fears that hate speech and misinformation would skyrocket. But, this shouldn’t have been the only concern, as in actuality it appears content regarding abortion access has been the biggest target of censorship.

@gmanews

Mark Zuckerberg announced that Meta scrapped its US fact-checking program for a community-based system similar to X and reduced the curbs on discussions around contentious topics such as immigration and gender identity. The move marks a reversal in Meta's content moderation policy as CEO Mark Zuckerberg has long championed active content moderation despite criticism from conservatives for alleged censorship on its platforms. COURTESY: Mark Zuckerberg/FB

♬ original sound - GMA News - GMA News

As The New York Times reported, Meta claims the recent censorship was due to its long-standing policy against selling pharmaceuticals without proper certification. But the inconsistency in enforcement is undeniable. Posts about abortion pills—specifically mifepristone and misoprostol, which the FDA approves for telehealth use—are flagged, while other drugs and substances continue to circulate freely. This “over-enforcement” excuse is getting old, especially when Meta admits that these crackdowns are often mistakes.

Nonetheless, despite following Meta’s policies, providers like Aid Access, one of the largest abortion pill distributors in the US, have had their posts removed and accounts blocked since November. The company’s Instagram account was even suspended recently, despite having complied with platform rules. The same fate has hit other organisations like Women Help Women and Just the Pill, who saw their accounts disappear, only to be restored after media intervention. It’s clear: Meta is strategically moving to silence the voices providing life-saving resources.

But this isn’t just a problem for one or two providers, it’s a systemic issue. Since the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, social media platforms have ramped up their censorship of abortion-related content. A wave of posts offering information on how to access abortion pills, or even just discussing reproductive health, has been scrubbed from online spaces.

Are we really surprised? Zuckerberg has made it clear that his embrace of the Trump administration will have a direct impact on the way Meta moderates its platforms. So, when the CEO promised to “loosen” speech restrictions, we should never have taken it at face value. If the shift were truly about empowering free speech, why does it so conveniently align with an aggressive crackdown on abortion pill content?

The truth is that Meta hasn’t loosened its grip on censorship at all. They’ve just sharpened their focus, targeting vulnerable groups and critical healthcare services.

Moreover, the company’s claim that this is an “over-enforcement” issue does little to reassure anyone. People have a right to access accurate health information without fear of their posts being deleted or their accounts being banned.

This is more than just content moderation, this is about power, control, and the attempt to erase reproductive rights from the digital space. The fight for free speech isn’t just happening in Congress, it’s happening online. And it’s a fight we can’t afford to lose.

Keep On Reading

By Abby Amoakuh

Abortion pill bans are back on the table as Donald Trump exposes allegiance to Project 2025

By Alma Fabiani

Pregnant woman fined for using carpool lane argues foetus counts as passenger in Roe v. Wade reversal irony

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

AI-generated images of Donald Trump with Black voters spread before US presidential election

By Charlie Sawyer

President Trump and JD Vance angry over the DNC setting up a taco truck outside RNC headquarters

By Charlie Sawyer

First look at $1 billion UK mini city where controversial HBO Harry Potter series will be filmed

By Charlie Sawyer

Harry Potter star defends Tom Felton over his controversial comments on JK Rowling’s transphobia

By Charlie Sawyer

Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz Beckham hire a lawyer to battle misinformation amid growing family rift

By Charlie Sawyer

What is ketamine therapy, the psychiatric treatment healing famous Mormons Jen and Zac Affleck’s marriage?

By Eliza Frost

Will Belly choose herself in the final episodes of The Summer I Turned Pretty?

By Eliza Frost

Kim Kardashian wants to know how much a carton of milk costs 

By Charlie Sawyer

Will Greta Thunberg reach Gaza safely amid Israel’s aid blockade?

By Charlie Sawyer

Sabrina Carpenter accused of centering men on controversial album cover

By Eliza Frost

Taylor Swift announces new album on Travis Kelce’s podcast. Everything we know about TS12 so far

By Eliza Frost

How fans manifested Elle Fanning as Effie Trinket in The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping

By Eliza Frost

Jennifer Aniston to star in Apple TV+ adaptation of Jennette McCurdy’s memoir I’m Glad My Mom Died

By Charlie Sawyer

Lawmakers pressure Trump to provide evidence that Venezuelan asylum seeker Andry Hernández Romero is still alive

By Charlie Sawyer

Meghan Trainor is not responsible for eradicating fatphobia. But her fans also have a right to be upset

By Charlie Sawyer

What is Mar-a-Lago face? Unpacking the beauty trend prompted by Donald Trump’s second term

By Eliza Frost

Misogyny, sexism, and the manosphere: how this year’s Love Island UK has taken a step backwards

By Eliza Frost

Controversial American Apparel owner just opened LA Apparel in NYC and TikTok girlies are flocking to shop