Professional trolls are getting paid to stir up trouble online: here’s who’s paying them and why

By Malavika Pradeep

Published Apr 16, 2021 at 09:30 AM

Reading time: 4 minutes

16938

Internet trolls are not a new phenomenon, in fact, they’ve been around since the late 1980s. However, in an era where cancel culture has become synonymous with cyber-bullying, we spot the rise of a new genre of trolls altogether—ones who are backed by a company’s payroll to infiltrate, manipulate and control online conversations surrounding their rivals. Welcome to the nasty little business of professional trolling.

What is professional trolling?

Professional trolling can be summed up as the coordinated efforts to spread online ‘disinformation’a subset of misinformation that is deliberately deceptive and misleading. The practice essentially offers governments, political parties and tech firms a fast and cheap way to weaken their rivals. This is done by exclusively employing people to carry out such trolling activities.

Typically roped in from developing countries, these employees are responsible for posting troll comments on various social media forums. They work in organised groups by setting up call-centre like operations, later following companies and influencers targeted by their employers. Masquerading as ‘one of us’, they then infiltrate the comments section and manipulate the conversation by inundating social media with conspiracy theories.

Subjecting other users to social media conditioning, these professional trolls distort the truth by copy-pasting curated thoughts infinite times until they pass off as truth. These fabricated lies are then picked up by other users who end up liking and even sharing these thoughts in their own social circles.

In many ways, professional trolling can be compared to what is happening in the US’ news landscape and the infiltration of pink slime in the country’s local news.

The consequent impact of professional trolling

Comment sections can often be the best part about a piece of news, adding a layer of social dialogue onto traditional journalism. It is for this aspect that many head over and engage with other like-minded individuals. However, this practice can also be extremely devastating.

A study published in The Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication asked participants to first read a news post on a fictitious blog explaining the potential risks and benefits of a new product and then head over to the comments section to engage with other readers. The sample comments posted under the article then exposed participants to both civil and uncivil opinions. The results were surprising and disturbing at the same time—uncivil comments not only polarised readers but often impacted a participant’s interpretation of the story itself.

A digital analyst at The Atlantic further conducted a study to analyse this polarisation, only to resonate with the above-mentioned findings. The participants who were exposed to negative comments in the study were more likely to judge the quality of the article and—regardless of the content—doubt the truth it stated. These findings essentially make one believe that we are all just one comment away from losing our faith in humanity.

The rise of underground troll farms

Last month, Facebook uncovered a massive ‘troll farm’ in Albania, linked to an Iranian militant group. The operations of the group had the “hallmarks of a typical troll farm,” which Facebook defines as “a physical location where a collective of operators share computers and phones to jointly manage a pool of fake accounts as part of an influence operation.”

“It looked like a team of trolls hot-desking,” tweeted Ben Nimmo, Facebook’s Global Influence Operations Threat lead. Nimmo noted the trolling operation resembling that of a full-time job from 6 am to 11 pm “with a break around lunchtime.”

Just last week, Digital Africa Research Lab and Buzzfeed News uncovered a large troll operation in Nigeria. Led in collaboration between a Nigerian PR firm and a UK-based nonprofit organisation, the operation paid social media influencers in Nigeria to tweet twice a week in support of a Columbian businessman, Alex Saab, accused of money laundering in the US. Following the report, Twitter went on to suspend more than 1,500 accounts for manipulating #FreeAlexSaab.

“Operations like these tend to be about making noise,” tweeted Nimmo. “They create the impression that a viewpoint is more popular than it is.” Although secretive in nature, such professional troll farms tend to share key attributes, which helps researchers and tech platforms to sniff them out almost instantaneously.

First attribute is that of shared physical location. “Troll farms are often propped up by a party that will pay for high-speed internet and computers that together power the network,” noted Axios. “It’s easier to finance and monitor operations that physically sit close together.”

Next up is the time frame: content from troll farms tends to be posted during work hours, with breaks for lunch as noted by Nimmo earlier. The last factor which distinguishes the presence of such operations is ‘hyper-targeted messaging’. “Posts from troll farms tend to zero in on a certain political message whereas most ordinary users post about an array of topics,” Axios concluded.

A monetised ‘revolution’

Professional trolling fosters a “symbiotic relationship between companies eager to weaken rivals and developing nations eager for cash.” In an interview with Axios, Carroll, a 20-year veteran with the FBI, admitted to seeing such trolls being employed from places like Vietnam, Philippines, and Malaysia. “Where there’s a lot of cheap labor and little oversight,” he added.

“We’re also seeing a lot more troll operations being picked up in Africa,” said Jean le Roux, a researcher at the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, in the interview. “More people in Africa are going online on social media,” he continued. “At the same time, Africa is one of poorer continents, which creates an easy recipe for countries like Russia to step in and pay someone to sit behind a computer all day.” These organisations go lengths to set up ‘cut-outs’ or systems to pay trollers without having to go through a bank that would get them noticed. Experts at covering up their tracks, they usually distribute money via a third-party on the ground itself.

With all this being said, however, professional trolling is seen as a double-edged sword, terrifying for some, favourable to others. While a good amount of critics perceive it as a practice that puts “the integrity of the internet at stake,” some companies praise it for bringing revenue-producing traffic to their website. For these organisations, all publicity is good publicity.

“The best way to slow down professional trolls is to make it more expensive for them to carry out disinformation campaigns,” le Roux added. A Twitter campaign periodically reminds followers to ignore anonymous comments on social media platforms. “You wouldn’t listen to someone named Bonerman26 in real life. Don’t read the comments,” a viral tweet reads.

While transparent comment systems and forums could help regulate the practice, the veil of anonymity given to users can’t be completely removed from such platforms—breeding in turn—a space where professional trolls influence users while flying under the radar. Whether or not you choose to read or engage with the comments of these paywall-backed trolls, it’s always a good idea to harbour scepticism for them. After all, like le Roux mentioned, trolling requires very few technical skills to carry out with almost every emerging economy susceptible to the practice.

Keep On Reading

By Charlie Sawyer

Unpacking the Chappell Roan drama, from toxic fandoms to political missteps

By Abby Amoakuh

Sex workers in the UK say the financial institutions are waging a war against them

By Charlie Sawyer

Misogyny to be labelled as extremism in the UK as Labour ramp up national security review

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

The only thing contestants can find on Perfect Match is sexism, abuse and homophobia

By Charlie Sawyer

Australian journalist slams viewer who said her outfit was inappropriate for reading the news

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Trump-appointed judge faces backlash over viral video exposing her opinions on dwarf tossing

By Emma O'Regan-Reidy

What are Pit Viper sunglasses? From their 90s roots to their controversial fanbase

By Abby Amoakuh

Donald Trump versus Joe Biden: how will the candidates’ approach to student loans impact votes?

By Charlie Sawyer

Netflix docuseries reveals Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders have a similar salary to Chick-fil-A worker

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

From viral Boiler Room sessions to Ibiza residencies, DJ duo Prospa are only getting started

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Armie Hammer breaks silence on cannibal rumours and assault allegations in podcast interview

By Malavika Pradeep

Pose 28, toxic themes and Lana lore: Exploring Gen Z’s obsession with Roblox’s Dress To Impress

By Charlie Sawyer

Rats in New York City officially have greater access to birth control than US citizens do

By Charlie Sawyer

Donald Trump turns to son Barron and right-wing influencer Bo Loudon to secure conservative Gen Z vote

By Charlie Sawyer

Wellness TikTokers spread conspiracy theory that sunscreen is bad for you

By Louis Shankar

None of the UK political parties’ manifestos offer proper protection for the LGBTQIA+ community

By Charlie Sawyer

Straight men are lying about their sexuality on dating apps to try and get more likes

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Blake Lively criticised for another tone-deaf comment in new It Ends with Us interview

By Malavika Pradeep

Sadfishing is the toxic social media trend most gen Zers are probably guilty of

By Abby Amoakuh

Here is what really happened between Julia Roberts and Travis Kelce at the Eras Tour in Dublin