The IndieWeb: a kinder, better way of networking online

By Sanjana Varghese

Updated May 19, 2020 at 03:26 PM

Reading time: 3 minutes

2003

Social media’s overwhelming effects on our minds, our relationships, and our senses have become increasingly obvious over the last few years. More and more people who were taken in by the excitement of social networks as they were originally pitched—a kind of optimistic, anything goes part of the internet where we would have all of the world’s available information at our fingertips alongside our friends and family who live far away—are now disgruntled. But there’s no denying that social media filled a valuable gap in maturing the internet’s functions. As it became a bigger part of our lives, it makes sense that people would seek to duplicate their social lives, and perhaps enhance them in other ways.

A recent movement, the IndieWeb, has appeared, as various websites, networks, and groups have sprung up online that aim to concentrate power, control, and ownership of your data back into the hands of people who actually use the networks, not just the companies who own them. Rather than posting on Twitter, Facebook or Instagram (two of which are actually Facebook’s companies), why not opt into a network which lets you publish on your own servers, without the advertising pressure?

In this version of the internet, people aren’t addicted to their social media feeds for instant gratification—or so the justification goes—but are using these networks to find out more about the world, talk to their friends, family and strangers, and are overall having a more pleasant experience than the one we’re used to on the internet.

Some examples include Mastodon, Peach and are.na, all of which function in completely different ways, but prioritise genuine interactions among members of communities, and an open-ended approach to becoming a member of those said communities. In part, this is possible because they’re crowdfunded by a group that cares about creating these spaces, and they’re often far smaller than large social networks like Twitter. They are not general networking sites, for example, and they’re not widely adopted enough to give you job opportunities or another career. These websites generally don’t use people’s data as their profit-making mechanism either, unlike the servers of massive social networks that are owned by the companies in question. Our regulatory mechanisms, as well as how we think about these questions politically haven’t really caught up with how much of our information is legally owned by massive companies, and how many rights they have to profit from it.

The idea of the IndieWeb is not a cohesive movement or an organisation led by one person; these operate away from large, commercial social networks and are often self-organised by a community that wants to cater better to itself. What the majority of IndieWeb platforms do have in common is a commitment to a better social media experience, one that isn’t marked by a lack of civility, and one which rejects the advertising-driven model of other social media networks.

Independent social networks fulfil a gap which most people will not have realised is missing. Gone are the pointless conversations that you end up getting dragged into on Twitter, where someone you don’t know misinterprets a tweet, and gone is the experience of going on Facebook and having really weird targeted advertising that feels a little creepy. For the most part, websites and apps that are part of the IndieWeb aim to bring back some of the better elements of using the internet with far less of the worrying elements that we’ve come to be accustomed to.

There are many reasons why this version of the internet is more appealing too. IndieWeb platforms don’t have that addictive sensibility (arguably, as of yet) that is integral to the motions of networks like Twitter and Instagram. Frankly, a lot of them aren’t (as of yet) large enough to get people a huge audience for what they’re saying, and they’re still relatively underground so it’s unlikely an employer could find you on there unless they were specifically looking. Some websites, such as are.na, are noticeably more abstract than others, (you create blocks and collections around themes or ideas), making the platform more suited for certain purposes than others.

The joy of using the IndieWeb comes in how relatively decentralised it is. While there may be a central team running a website, the idea is that every individual can control their own network, with many of these websites giving people the opportunity to control their own servers. For example, Mastodon lets you set up an instance, like a chronological timeline, by downloading the software. Then other people can do the same, and those instances join together to create a federation, where people can follow different topics across boards. People tend not to follow huge amounts of boards or themes, just a few specific ones that they can really engage with meaningfully. Unlike most websites and apps we use today, IndieWeb websites defy the attention economy as they aren’t necessarily designed to keep people on them for as long as possible in the way that social networks do because they don’t harvest your data to sell to third parties for profit.

Overwhelmingly, the majority of people who use the internet regularly seem to know that something is just not right; broken. Social media networks are only a symptom of the problem—so perhaps a kinder, better way of networking online is one way to help fix it. It might seem optimistic, but IndieWeb websites and apps are already out there online. The question is, are we willing to leave the likes, followers, and sensation of self-fulfillment to join the movement? Although saying ‘yes’ feels like the right decision, very few people are actually motivated enough to leave this glamorous online appearance for a simpler web and a simpler life.

Keep On Reading

By Abby Amoakuh

Everybody’s talking about these White Lotus season 3 theories, and so should you

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Who is Noor Alfallah, the woman with geriatric rizz dating Hollywood’s most famous grandpas?

By Abby Amoakuh

Why are people tagging Bad Bunny in videos of them crying? The DtMF TikTok trend explained

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Elon Musk’s grandfather’s far-right ties: Exploring the roots of the billionaire’s radical beliefs

By Louis Shankar

2025’s most anticipated movies: What to watch for in the new year

By Charlie Sawyer

Here’s the real reason Armie Hammer shut down Louis Theroux’s questions about cannibalism

By Abby Amoakuh

First ever porn app launches on iOS devices to coincide with iPhone’s 18th birthday

By Alma Fabiani

BLACKPINK’s Jennie, Lisa and Rosé caught saying the N word in newly leaked videos

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Unmasking exploitation in Africa: My undercover journey into Kenya’s Chinese seafood factories

By Abby Amoakuh

German AfD party under fire for handing out Nazi-inspired fake deportation tickets to migrants 

By Charlie Sawyer

Unhinged podcast’s viral TikTok exposes how sexist phrases reflect men’s failures

By Abby Amoakuh

A femicide crisis is silently unfolding in Germany. We asked experts to weigh in on the reasons why

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Ready for an early career break? The microretirement trend is Gen Z’s new way of escaping job stress

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

What is going on with Sky News Australia? Conspiracy theories, plagiarism, and Selena Gomez drama explained

By Louis Shankar

BlueSky sees 300% surge in users after 2024 US presidential election

By Abby Amoakuh

Bridgerton fans on X accuse show of sidelining Simone Ashley and her character Kate Sharma

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

FBI investigators uncover shocking evidence related to racist text messages to minorities

By Charlie Sawyer

What is Mar-a-Lago face? Unpacking the beauty trend prompted by Donald Trump’s second term

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Is Millie Bobby Brown going to play Britney Spears in a new biopic?

By Charlie Sawyer

Why are people so upset about JoJo Siwa’s $900 Dream VIP package on her upcoming tour?