You might soon be able to communicate with machines without talking

By Alma Fabiani

Published May 23, 2019 at 12:32 PM

Reading time: 2 minutes

1888

Last month, a team of scientists led by Edward Chang from the University of California in San Francisco, found a way to decode specific signals in the brain that convert our thoughts into words. By understanding these signals, they’re making tentative steps towards merging our minds with machines. Just like with anything else, change is exciting, especially technological advances transforming the medical field, but when it comes to the human brain, a part of me can’t help but fear what’s to come.

The outcome of this research could lead to are endless opportunities, such as creating a system that could help severely paralysed people speak. This same technology could equally be used for more trivial purposes, like mentally dictating texts and sending them from your phone—drunk texting is about to get way worse. Using this technology to help paralysed people should be more important than creating another way for us to be texting non-stop. Although I must admit, sending text messages without picking up my phone sounds intriguing.

Talking is not something we usually stop and think about, it just comes out. What really happens is that your brain sends signals to your lips, tongue, jaw, and larynx to produce whatever you’re about to say. Edward Chang and his team used electrodes, placed on the brain’s surface, to record those signals. They then entered the signals into a computer model of the human vocal system for it to generate synthesised speech.

At the moment, the technology is far from becoming widely used or even accepted, as according to Chang, this technology is not able to work with electrodes placed outside of the brain, meaning that for now, people will have to undergo neurosurgery in order to put electrodes on the surface of the brain.

Hannah-Madersbacher-@gridzstudio

In the U.S. again, but on the East Coast this time, at Columbia University in New York City, researchers started testing a potentially transformative system that could help people using hearing aids by amplifying the voice they want to listen to and blocking any background noises. To understand exactly what the listener wants to hear, it uses electrodes placed on the section of the brain that processes sounds (the auditory cortex). As the brain focuses on each voice, it generates a specific electrical signature for each speaker.

The researchers at Columbia University then created a deep-learning algorithm that was trained to differentiate voices and look for the closest match between this electrical signature and the ones of the many speakers in the room. Once the algorithm’s choice is made, the hearing aid would just amplify the voice that matches best—doing so with an average accuracy of 91 percent.

Although this system is only a trial for now, one obvious stumbling block could already be a worry for potential users: just like the first research mentioned, to implant the electrodes, patients would have to undergo brain surgery—a very risky operation. Additionally, this technology could end up being used for the wrong purpose. What if people without hearing impairment used it to boost their ability to focus on one voice; to listen to private conversations? Call me a pessimistic but in this day and age, trusting technology with our privacy has been proven to be hazardous at best, so going ahead and getting it implemented inside our brains seems extremely dystopian.

The concern surrounding these two studies can be similarly raised about any new upcoming invasive technology that would require researchers to come anywhere near our brain. If further developed, this technology could be perfected and the chances of anything going wrong reduced, but what if, sometimes, pushing scientific boundaries goes too far? We’ve reached a stage where almost nothing seems impossible. Surely this level of invasion should come with ethical boundaries—let’s learn from our past mistakes.

Keep On Reading

By Eliza Frost

Kendall Jenner reveals plans to quit Kardashian fame for a normal job

By Eliza Frost

Glen Powell’s GQ photoshoot is a satiric look at modern day males—and he’s in on the joke 

By Eliza Frost

Rina Sawayama calls out Sabrina Carpenter’s SNL performance of Nobody’s Son for cultural insensitivity 

By Eliza Frost

Jessie Cave was banned from a Harry Potter fan convention because of her OnlyFans account

By Eliza Frost

The Summer I Turned Pretty’s Chris Briney is at the centre of a new love triangle, but this time for an audio erotica story 

By Eliza Frost

People think Donald Trump is dead and they’re using the Pentagon Pizza Index to prove it

By Eliza Frost

What is Shrekking? The latest toxic dating trend explained 

By Eliza Frost

Sabrina Carpenter says you need to get out more if you think Man’s Best Friend artwork is controversial 

By Eliza Frost

If everyone has an AI boyfriend, what does that mean for the future of Gen Z dating?

By Eliza Frost

Everything to know about Justin Lee Fisher, arrested at Travis Kelce’s home over Taylor Swift deposition papers from Justin Baldoni

By Eliza Frost

Controversial American Apparel owner just opened LA Apparel in NYC and TikTok girlies are flocking to shop

By Eliza Frost

Millie Bobby Brown reportedly accuses Stranger Things co-star David Harbour of harassment and bullying 

By Eliza Frost

Kim Kardashian wants to know how much a carton of milk costs 

By Eliza Frost

Did Katy Perry just confirm relationship with ex-Canadian PM Justin Trudeau?

By Eliza Frost

The Summer I Turned Pretty is getting a movie. Could it be here in time for Christmas?

By Eliza Frost

Why is everyone saying ‘Six-Seven’? The meaning behind the viral phrase

By Eliza Frost

Will Belly choose herself in the final episodes of The Summer I Turned Pretty?

By Eliza Frost

Gen Z can’t afford one-night stands as rising cost of living causes sex recession

By Eliza Frost

What is dry begging? And why is it a relationship red flag?

By Eliza Frost

Cruz Beckham’s girlfriend Jackie Apostel defends the couple’s age gap relationship