Betsy DeVos passes new rules that give sexual predators green light on campus

By Yair Oded

Updated May 18, 2020 at 12:37 PM

Reading time: 3 minutes

6621

Last week, the US Department of Education issued its final rules on the handling of sexual assault allegations that narrow the definition of sexual assault, increase protections for the accused and reduce schools’ liability in dealing with such cases.

Sexual assault and misconduct have long plagued US schools and universities. After decades of educational institutions mishandling and actively suppressing accusations of sexual assault, the Obama administration issued guidelines in 2011 and 2014 that expanded protections for survivors and increased the accountability of schools in handling complaints.

They did so, essentially, by widening the scope of Title IX—a federal law that defends people from being discriminated against based on their sex in federally-funded education programs and activities. Under the Obama-era guidelines, schools were obligated to take action on any sexual assault case they knew about or “reasonably” should have been aware of, and were instructed to adopt low standards of evidence in the adjudication process.

The new rules, which are due to go into effect on 14 August, upend the previous guidelines. Notably, they reduce the scope of Title IX and narrow the definition of sexual assault to “unwelcome conduct that is so severe, pervasive and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person equal access to the school’s education program or activity.” Schools are now instructed to dismiss complaints that do not fall under this new definition, regardless of the validity of the allegations.

The new rules also state that schools will be required to respond only to cases that took place during school-related activities (either on or off-campus), excluding study abroad programs, and give schools discretion in choosing the standard of proof they wish to uphold. Unlike the Obama-era guidelines, the new rules relieve coaches and other school employees (such as faculty and residential life staff) of the responsibility to report cases of sexual misconduct and assault—stipulating that only complaints that are made to designated Title IX coordinators will have to be addressed.

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, for whom the completion of the new rules constitutes a considerable victory, defended her Department’s guidelines, stating that, “Too many students have lost access to their education because their school inadequately responded when a student filed a complaint of sexual harassment or sexual assault (…) This new regulation requires schools to act in meaningful ways to support survivors of sexual misconduct, without sacrificing important safeguards to ensure a fair and transparent process.”

But many human rights advocates decry the new rules, arguing that they severely impinge on rights of survivors and foster a culture of institutional suppression and neglect around sexual assault. “If student survivors of sexual assault cannot prove that harassment escalated to the point that their ability to access education was ‘effectively denied’, then schools are not required to take action,” Divya Srinivasan, a human rights lawyer at Equality Now, told Screen shot.

“We know that sexual harassment and assault impacts victims in a variety of ways, for some it means they are not able to focus on work or school, but others cope by going about ‘business as usual’. For those that cannot prove that their education has been derailed, then they are left unprotected.”

“The new rules raise the standard of liability under which schools can be held accountable for ignoring complaints or failing to take action,” Srinivasan added. “Schools are only liable now if they were ‘deliberately indifferent’ in a way that is ‘clearly unreasonable’, making it extremely difficult for survivors to hold schools accountable for failing to take action on their complaints. Schools will now just need to tick certain procedural boxes and comply ‘on paper’ to avoid liability and they will be able to mistreat or bully survivors as long as their actions do not meet the high standard of being ‘clearly unreasonable’. The Department of Education has essentially allowed schools to go back to shoving sexual harassment complaints under the carpet, with little threat of being held accountable, gutting the very purpose of Title IX.”

One of the most controversial aspects of the new rules is the stipulation that calls for live hearings with cross-examinations to be conducted between accusers and the accused, in which the latter could question evidence and challenge the validity of the allegations. While students will not be addressing each other directly in such hearings, and will be able to request they be conducted virtually in separate rooms, many still worry that this procedure will compel survivors to withdraw their complaints or refrain from coming forward altogether.

“Many survivors could be coerced or pressured into agreeing to attend [mediation processes] by schools who are more interested in protecting their reputations than the well-being of the student. Such mediation processes can be used as a tool to silence survivors,” said Srinivasan.

The new guidelines are due to be challenged in court by human rights advocates, and could also be rescinded in Congress should Democrats regain control of the Senate and maintain their majority in the House in November’s elections.

But as legal battles are waged, it is important to view the new rules within the larger context of the Trump’s administration’s persistent attack on women. As women are statistically more vulnerable to sexual assault, particularly while in school, the new rules must be recognised for what they are: another attempt by the current government to chip away at the rights and protections of women.

Keep On Reading

By Charlie Sawyer

Why I never considered reporting the man who flashed me to the police

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

From teen mum to Gen Z favourite, Angela Rayner is the icon politics needs

By Abby Amoakuh

Harry Potter reboot hit with racist backlash for casting Black actor Paapa Essiedu as Severus Snape

By Abby Amoakuh

Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl dancer Zül-Qarnain Nantambu sets record straight on viral protest

By Abby Amoakuh

Holly Scarfone reveals Scott Disick allegedly pressured her to get a boob job and BBL

By Abby Amoakuh

Why Gen Z are cancelling Call Her Daddy following Amy Schumer’s controversial appearance

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Was Adam Sandler kicked out of the 2025 Oscars or was it staged? Fans speculate after his fiery outburst

By Abby Amoakuh

Epstein and Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre becomes centre of conspiracy theories after revealing she has days to live

By Abby Amoakuh

Stormzy faces backlash from fans after partnering with McDonald’s and deleting pro-Palestinian post

By Abby Amoakuh

New video game that allows men to r*pe female family members triggers backlash amid incel concerns

By Abby Amoakuh

Why TikTok’s The Substance trend comparing celebrities of different ages misses the movie’s point

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

What is the mermaid eating parties conspiracy theory, and why are TikTokers now obsessed with it?

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Why are so many women dying in jail? Reports point to inadequate medical care and systemic neglect

By Charlie Sawyer

Not only are BMI scores sexist, racist and anxiety-inducing, they’re also massively inaccurate

By Abby Amoakuh

What is soft swinging? And why is the term trending on Mormon TikTok?

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Comedian Druski issues statement following serious abuse allegations in Diddy lawsuit

By J'Nae Phillips

The goth girl glow-up: How Jenna Ortega’s helping Gen Z rethink this dark aesthetic

By Charlie Sawyer

Mason Disick starts trending on X after rumours circulate that he has a secret child named Piper

By Charlie Sawyer

We asked men on the street: Would you rather share your emotions with a tree or a woman? Their answers said a lot

By Charlie Sawyer

Is Brooklyn Beckham feuding with his family? Rumours circulate after the chef skips his dad David Beckham’s 50th birthday