Following Elon Musk’s controversial takeover of Twitter, celebrities and civilians alike began to flee the social media platform. However, it appears as though some exceedingly loyal—and creative—fanboys are sticking by the self-proclaimed free speech absolutist’s side.
In a rather bizarre turn of events, a group of ‘Musk men’ have decided to prove their dedication in the most extravagant way possible: by constructing an expensive statue which has been described by commentators as a gigantic monument, displaying a goat with the head of their hero Musk riding a rocket. And here we were, thinking the fanboys would draw the line at throwing literal infants in front of a Tesla to prove its autopilot detractors wrong.
According to tech-based magazine BoingBoing, the driving force of this extensive project are also the Muskinities behind the cryptocurrency Elon GOAT Token ($EGT). According to the EGT website, the monument in question has been constructed in honour of the supposed “Godfather of Crypto,” and the fanboys even encouraged Musk himself to join them and “claim this historical gift.” I wish I was making this up, trust me.
Metal sculptor and creator of the statue, Kevin Stone, completed the monument in July 2022 and it has since been touring the US. The EGT fandom teased the creation earlier in the year before it was unveiled, revealing that: “[Stone] is creating a massive six-foot tall head of Elon Musk. If that isn’t strange enough, he is also building a 30-foot long body of a goat for the head to sit on. It won’t just be a goat with the head of Musk, but will feature real rocket fire, smoke, lasers, concert lighting, and music. It will be a global spectacle that is sure to go viral beyond crypto and into mainstream media.”
In an even weirder development, the force behind this stature has also described it as a “biblical sized gift.” And while I can imagine there may have been grandiose plans for the monument to have a philosophically-greater meaning, I’m afraid the reality is far different.
Not only has the stature been heavily criticised due to the extortionate reckless spending, it’s also well being laughed at. A six-foot large Musk head, placed upon a gigantic goat and on top of a rocket? Well, it practically comes across like a communal joke on the Tesla CEO.
Musk—or the people’s problematic prince—has, at times, been the recipient of great praise, primarily for his groundbreaking SpaceX ventures. However, he’s recently garnered monumental criticism for his mass worldwide firings of Twitter employees during his takeover. According to Politico, Musk has laid off approximately 4,000 employees from teams across the globe, citing “cost-cutting” as justification.
But, if you were still interested in jumping at the opportunity to lay gifts at the feet of the rocket-riding GOAT—visitor spots are still available on the EGT website. So it’s not too late to head down, have a few belly laughs, and Instagram it to meme kingdom.
If you’re someone who keeps up with Elon Musk’s unchecked Twitter obsession, you might’ve noticed how Tesla fanboys have evolved into a full-blown subculture over time—initiating toxic slews of attacks against others who don’t fancy themselves on the “bleeding edge of innovation” or make the same “planet-friendly” choice as they did. Heck, they’d even go to ridiculous lengths just to prove their point.
Such is the case with Twitter user Taylor Ogan, who first uploaded a video of a Tesla Model Y and a Lexus RX performing a side-by-side test to see if their autopilot systems would detect a defenceless, child-sized mannequin on the road and slam its brake early enough to avoid running it over.
As claimed by the results of the video, the Tesla flunked the test by bulldozing into the fake child and yeeting its body like a bowling pin before coming to a complete stop. “It’s 2022, and Teslas still aren’t stopping for children,” Ogan captioned the resultant post, mentioning how the Lexus RX that stopped for the dummy is equipped with LiDAR—a technology Tesla Motors CEO Musk still refuses to use for self-driving.
“LiDAR is the same technology used in autonomous vehicles, which Tesla incidentally does not have,” Ogan went on to explain.
The Guardian also reported on a recent safety test conducted by the Dawn Project, where the latest version of Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD) Beta software repeatedly ran over a stationary, child-sized mannequin in its path. The claims issued by the advocacy group form part of an ad campaign urging the public to pressure Congress to ban Tesla’s autopilot technology.
“Elon Musk says Tesla’s FSD software is ‘amazing’. It’s not. It’s a lethal threat to all Americans,” founder of the Dawn Project, Dan O’Dowd, told the publication. “Over 100,000 Tesla drivers are already using the car’s FSD mode on public roads, putting children at great risk in communities across the country.”
While footage from both tests has left the public disturbed, The Guardian noted how Tesla has earned a reputation for hitting back at claims that its autopilot is too “underdeveloped” to guarantee the safety of either the car’s occupants or pedestrians on the road. “After a fiery crash in Texas in 2021 that killed two, Musk tweeted that the autopilot feature, a less sophisticated version of FSD, was not switched on at the moment of collision,” the publication highlighted.
Now, it seems that Tesla fanboys—or ‘Tessies’ as some netizens call them—are hell-bent on defending their favourite auto maker’s honour. Taking to Twitter, most of them argue that, as the “children” involved were not made of flesh and blood but rather of cardboard and stuffing, the test did not prove if a Tesla would stop in front of an actual human child.
“Such a pointless test. Watch FSD beta. It registers every person in the vicinity and if anything, is overly cautious,” a user commented. “It has never hit anybody despite 40 million miles driven. 40 million. This is a fake, useless, non ‘real world’ test.”
“This is staged. You’ve never said one positive thing about Tesla, ever and invest in LiDAR,” a second wrote, while a third wildly admitted: “If I’m pressing the accelerator, the car should do what I tell it to do no matter what. It shouldn’t matter if there’s 100 children in front of the car, it shouldn’t override the driver’s manual input under any circumstances. So, BS test.”
The Dawn Project’s Twitter post also sported similar criticism, with one netizen stating, “Do you really think that the Americans are so stupid to believe in this staged video? I bet the driver was pressing on the accelerator pedal and the operator deliberately didn’t film the bottom of the Tesla screen so the viewers wouldn’t see a warning about it.”
According to most enthusiasts, the driver seated behind the wheel in Dawn Project’s safety test does not actually engage FSD as the sidelines on the screen were still grey in colour when recorded on camera. “When FSD is engaged, the lines turn blue,” a user explained. On 11 August 2022, The Guardian also updated the headline of their article to indicate that the Dawn Project’s test results were “claimed by the group, and have not been independently verified.”
Nevertheless, as soon as someone commented “but that’s a fake child. I bet it would work if it was a real child,” Tesla fanboys got to work, with one Twitter user risking it all to prove that the world’s leading electric car would stop for an actual child.
“Is there anyone in the Bay Area with a child who can run in front of my car on Full Self-Driving Beta to make a point? I promise I won’t run them over… (will disengage if needed),” @WholeMarsBlog tweeted, adding that it was a “serious request.”
“This is completely safe as there will be a human in the car,” the user continued, later updating their followers with: “Okay someone volunteered… They just have to convince their wife.” I wish this was a joke. But the enthusiast then detailed a list of instructions that will be followed during the test, including the fact that the child’s father would be seated behind the wheel.
Given the fact that the autopilot claims are yet to be verified and could well be another “smear campaign” against Tesla, as labelled by enthusiasts, it’s justified to note how the insights put forth by the advocacy group are not 100 per cent believable at this point. That being said, using living and breathing children as test subjects to prove a point is never a good idea.