Adidas backtracks over shameful move to bar Black Lives Matter from using three stripes trademark

By Alma Fabiani

Published Mar 29, 2023 at 12:15 PM

Reading time: 1 minute

42634

On Monday 27 March 2023, German sportswear giant Adidas asked the US Patent and Trademark Office to reject an application for a Black Lives Matter (BLM) trademark featuring three parallel stripes. The company, known for its own unmistakable triple stripe, argued that it would mislead the public if the political and social movement used a yellow-stripe design.

In its filing, the brand sought to block BLM’s application to use the design on similar goods to the ones Adidas sells, such as bags, t-shirts, hats, and more. As you can imagine, netizens were quick to condemn the move, with many pointing out how easy it would be for people to mistake Adidas’ trademark objection as criticism of the Black Lives Matter movement and mission.

This, in turn, led to the sportswear label’s embarrassingly quick backtrack. On Wednesday 29 March, the company released a statement announcing its change of mind: “Adidas will withdraw its opposition to the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation’s trademark application as soon as possible.”

Right after the news hit the unforgiving Twittersphere, users immediately assumed battle stations,  jokingly coming up with other potential trademark disputes Adidas might go after:

Though it should be noted that the company is no stranger to filing lawsuits over its three-stripe trademark—it’s filed over 90 lawsuits and signed more than 200 settlement agreements related to the design since 2008—this controversy couldn’t come at a worse time for Adidas.

Following the end of its incredibly lucrative collaboration with Kanye West on Yeezy over anti-Semitic comments made repeatedly by the rapper, it was reported less than a week ago that the firm would also end its high-profile partnership with Beyoncé and the singer’s athleisure brand IVY PARK.

As if all of this wasn’t enough, in January, Adidas lost a lawsuit it had filed back in 2021 against New York designer Thom Browne’s luxury brand, claiming that the eponymous label’s four-bar and “Grosgrain” stripe patterns on its shoes and high-end activewear violated its three-stripe trademark rights.

According to a court filing, the German company had planned to ask the jury for over $7.8 million in damages, plus additional punitive damages and a cut of Thom Browne’s infringing sales. It also requested a court order stopping Thom Browne from using the designs.

Ultimately, the jury found that the fashion house’s parallel stripe designs were not likely to cause consumer confusion with Adidas’ products. Among other things, Thom Browne had also argued that its designs have a completely different number of stripes. Seriously, Adidas?

Keep On Reading

By Charlie Sawyer

Vivek Ramaswamy is on a mission to turn BuzzFeed into a millennial conservative mouthpiece

By Abby Amoakuh

Tar in a bottle: Youthforia slammed by beauty influencers for dark foundation shade

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Children as young as eight are strip-searched every 14 hours by police in England and Wales

By Charlie Sawyer

Watch Coldplay bring out Michael J. Fox in emotional moment at Glastonbury festival

By Abby Amoakuh

Edinburgh accused of ousting homeless people from city ahead of Taylor Swift’s Eras tour concert

By Malavika Pradeep

Who is Kim Yeji, the South Korean sharpshooter breaking the internet with her aura?

By Abby Amoakuh

The rise of the amlete: How women are spearheading amateur endurance sports

By J'Nae Phillips

Why Gen Z still turn to nature and the great outdoors for fashion inspo years after gorpcore’s rise

By Abby Amoakuh

Jacquie Alexander blasts crime ring disguised as club that stole from her and Simone Biles

By Abby Amoakuh

I scoured London looking for a man in finance: Here’s what I found in my two-month search

By Abby Amoakuh

Industry insider accuses Kris Jenner’s boyfriend Corey Gamble of grooming Justin Bieber and more in wild interview

By Abby Amoakuh

Back to Black costume designer PC Williams spills the tea on We Are Lady Parts and Polite Society

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Grindr sued for allegedly sharing UK users’ HIV status with ad firms

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

UK to criminalise deepfake pornography, regardless of creator’s intentions

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Who is Usha Vance? The divisive wife of Republican VP candidate JD Vance

By Charlie Sawyer

Debunking 3 of the Republicans’ most pathetic insults about VP candidate Tim Walz

By Abby Amoakuh

Challengers representatives step in after movie poster with racial slur goes viral

By Alma Fabiani

What is a nepo baby, and why do they make everyone so mad?

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Report reveals psychiatric hospital allegedly forced patients to reuse menstrual pads for days

By Charlie Sawyer

Why North West’s Lion King performance has made me team nepo baby