Dear Missguided, who really paid for your £1 bikini? – SCREENSHOT Media

Dear Missguided, who really paid for your £1 bikini?

By Bianca Borissova

Updated May 19, 2020 at 03:43 PM

Reading time: 3 minutes

Last month, British MPs rejected plans for a 1p per garment fashion tax albeit our climate crisis. At the same time, a Missguided £1 bikini appeared on the market—something that should be beyond concerning for everyone. The U.K. has the highest consumption of fast fashion in the whole of Europe, with over a million tonnes of clothing ending up in landfills each year. So how much power do we as consumers really have when it comes to sustainability and why is this discussion still going on?

The swimsuit sold out promptly, with 1,000 bikinis dropping everyday on the brand’s website, which further raises the question of how it is possible to produce and retail an entire set for just £1, free delivery included. Missguided presented an official statement claiming the production cost was of a higher value to the retail cost, and that the bikini was a “gift” to their customers, in the name of “empowering women to look and feel good without breaking the bank”. Interestingly enough, 78 percent of the brand’s employees are female, yet, they are a 46 percent median wage gap between men and women. The brand ‘excuses’ itself on its website by claiming that this is due to “having more women than men” in lower paid positions, and fewer in higher ones. The lower paid positions include the factory ones, where workers often make as little as £3.50 an hourcontrasting with the U.K.’s minimum wage of £7.83 for over 25s.

Despite being one of the U.K.’s leading retail brands, according to the statistics conducted by the House of Commons, Missguided is also the least environmentally friendly, rejecting the use of recycled or organic materials in their products, clearly avoiding the Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals (ZDHC) programme as well as the sustainable clothing action plan. The government has the most power when it comes to regulating fast fashion, and yet, British MPs have rejected numerous regulations on the industry.

Many of these dismissals include the 1p per item tax to raise £35 million for clothing collection and sorting, the ban on incinerating or landfilling unsold stock, and even making a law requiring brands to publically release a modern slavery statement. In addition to this, the Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) has also urged to put lessons on designing, creating and repairing clothing into the school curriculum, as a means to end the era of ‘disposable clothing’ as well as for the MPs to explore a ‘sharing’ economy in which hiring and swapping would replace purchasing. The failure to implement these rules and regulations results in the continuation of unsustainable, disposable mass production, which ultimately affects the environmental crisis even further.

Marketing alone has so much power in influencing what the consumer chooses to buy, and fast fashion brands know this. The infamous swimsuit was advertised by last year’s Love Island contestant Ellie Brown, and being the official fashion sponsor of Love Island 2018, Missguided saw a 40 percent increase in sales. This year, another fast fashion brand, I Saw It First, secured a spot as the show’s official fashion partner, spending around £2 million on the partnership. With over 4.2 million viewers of Love Island’s first episode alone (57 percent appear to be 16-34 years old) the show has the ability to reach a huge number of potential consumers, and yet, it still decides to go for unethical brands.

Similarly, Emily Ratajkowski has recently launched a collection with Boohoo owned Nasty Gal, a brand known to be criticised for their mistreatment of workers while Kylie Jenner advertises for knock-off brand Fashion Nova via her Instagram with over 139.5 million followers. Celebrities and influencers make a conscious choice to promote these brands and in an age where Instagram seems to dictate all new trends, the choices they make allow us to feel a sense of relatability that we, too, can afford to dress like one of the Jenners. Although there is nothing wrong with that idea, influencers should also make a deliberate choice to promote more sustainable alternatives to their followers.

While it is the consumer who creates a demand for fast fashion, it’s unfair to entirely blame the consumer for the harmful environmental impacts or unethical working conditions of the industry. Of course, it’s true that spending £1 on a bikini could seem immensely appealing, but it is important to consider not only the impact this product will have on our planet, but also how the people who made it are affected by such low prices.

Affordable clothing is not only appealing but is essential too, and we consumers can help so much by simply buying less, shopping vintage or seeking other sustainable alternatives. Until the government or the brands alone begin regulating their carbon footprint, perhaps those with a platform should consider twice before encouraging impulse buying. Just putting it out there. In addition, Missguided has now changed the price of the bikini from £1 to £5a feeble attempt at clearing their conscience or is selling a swimsuit for a literal pound not making enough profit? Either way, nice try.

Keep On Reading

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Watch viral video of Jackie Chan sharing a wholesome moment with his daughter slammed online for being fake for this heartbreaking reason

By Mason Berlinka

Internet rapper Lil Tay dead at 14? Here’s everything you need to know

By Alma Fabiani

Got painful periods? This virtual clinic for period pain is here to help

By Alma Fabiani

Israeli doctors reattach Palestinian boy’s decapitated head after cycling crash

By Mason Berlinka

Red Dead Redemption for PS4 proves Rockstar still doesn’t know how to remaster a game

By Charlie Sawyer

Weekly roundup: The Idol is mid, Love Island is a snooze fest, and Tom Holland goes on hiatus

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Joe Jonas under scrutiny for asking Gigi Hadid out when she was 13 and he was 19

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg have agreed to fight each other. No, we’re not joking 

By Charlie Sawyer

Amy Schumer just called out Hilaria Baldwin on her fake Spanish accent

By Alma Fabiani

French journalist who infiltrated Paris police reveals disturbing pattern of racism and discrimination

By Charlie Sawyer

What is inflation, and how is it impacting gen Z?

By Charlie Sawyer

Who is Bobbi Althoff and why did she delete her viral podcast interview with Drake?

By Louis Shankar

Chess becomes latest sport to ban transgender women from competing in women’s events

By Charlie Sawyer

Men online are calling Margot Robbie mid ahead of Barbie film release

By Alma Fabiani

CDC warns US doctors of deadly Vibrio vulnificus outbreak as flesh-eating bacteria claims more lives

By Mason Berlinka

Who is TikToker Nekoglai? The Moldovan streamer tortured by Russia paying tribute to Ukrainian soldiers

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Watch videos of how Floridians are preparing for Hurricane Idalia to hit their homes

By Charlie Sawyer

Family of man who died because of Google Maps sues tech giant

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Morocco earthquake latest update: Rescue efforts intensify as death toll claims over 2,000 lives

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

New AI gaydar can detect someone’s sexuality with 81 per cent accuracy