Archaic Missouri law denies pregnant women the right to divorce, even in cases of domestic violence

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Published Mar 18, 2024 at 01:48 PM

Reading time: 2 minutes

55959

Imagine if one day, a woman who is trying to escape a violent relationship with an abusive partner seeks out help from her lawyer to explore options for starting the divorce process. However, rather than being counselled through the steps, the lawyer informs her that she cannot finalise a divorce in the US state of Missouri because she is, wait for it, pregnant.

A controversial law in Missouri has put a glaring spotlight on both reproductive rights and women’s rights across the US. The bill, which requires individuals to disclose their pregnancy status before filing for divorce, has sparked widespread condemnation and urgent calls for change. This archaic law, reminiscent of a bygone era, not only impedes the legal dissolution of marriages but also perpetuates cycles of abuse and control while trapping pregnant women in dangerous situations.

The statute’s origins, traced back to 1973, may have been well-intentioned, as it was aimed at ensuring the welfare of mothers and their children by addressing custody arrangements, child support post-birth, and adequate provisions.

However, its application today serves as a glaring example of systemic oppression and reproductive coercion. This sexist legislation effectively functions as a ban on divorce for pregnant individuals, leaving them vulnerable to continued abuse and manipulation at the hands of their spouses.

According to Newsweek, Missouri is not the only state with such restrictions. Similar bans exist in Arizona, Arkansas, and Texas. Additionally, in seven other states—including Hawaii, Maine, and Delaware—judges are reluctant to approve divorces when one spouse is pregnant.

Ashley Aune, a 38-year-old Democratic legislator, was shocked when she discovered that women in Missouri were prohibited from completing a divorce if they happened to be pregnant—regardless of whether they were facing abuse from their spouse. “I was floored that this was still on the books,” she told The Independent.

Such legal barriers not only perpetuate cycles of abuse but also exacerbate reproductive coercion, a disturbing tactic employed by abusers to control their victims’ reproductive autonomy. Following the erosion of the constitutional right to abortion, there was a dramatic 99 per cent increase in calls to the National Hotline for Domestic Violence within the initial year.

@nowthisimpact

Did you know if you’re pregnant, married, and living in Missouri right now, you are unable to get a divorce? Here’s what to know about this outdated law that also exists in 3 other states. #missouri #marriage #divorce #pregnancy

♬ original sound - NowThis Impact

In the face of such injustice, brave advocates like Aune refuse to remain silent. Aune’s impassioned advocacy for House Bill 2402 seeks to grant family court judges the discretion to expedite divorces in cases of pregnancy, offering a glimmer of hope for survivors trapped in abusive relationships. This legislative initiative, if enacted, could be a game-changer, empowering survivors to reclaim their agency and break free from the shackles of abuse.

Missouri has a notorious reputation for its stringent stance on reproductive health and autonomy. It proudly took the lead in banning abortion post the overturning of Roe v Wade in 2022, stubbornly refusing exceptions even in cases of rape and incest. The state’s approach is like taking a giant leap backwards into the Dark Ages of reproductive rights.

According to a 2023 report by the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, there have been alarming rates of pregnancy-related homicides between 2018 and 2022. Shockingly, 75 per cent of these fatalities occurred among Black women, highlighting a concerning disparity in maternal mortality rates.

Now, forgive me for getting a tad opinionated here, but what kind of world are we living in where women have to fight tooth and nail for the basic right to make decisions about their own bodies? It’s as though we’re caught in a twisted time warp, with lawmakers playing puppet masters with our fundamental rights. And for what? To satisfy some antiquated, morally rigid agenda that’s as outdated as a dial-up modem.

Let’s call a spade a spade: these lawmakers are not just out of touch, they’re downright dangerous. They’re waging a war on women’s autonomy under the guise of “protecting life,” conveniently turning a blind eye to the very real dangers that lurk in the shadows of reproductive coercion and domestic violence.

In the words of pioneering feminist icons like Gloria Steinem and Audre Lorde, the fight for reproductive justice is inseparable from the broader struggle for gender equality and liberation. Their powerful legacies inspire us to stand in solidarity with survivors and demand an end to systemic oppression in all its forms.

Keep On Reading

By Sofia Gallarate

3 ways we can fight for women’s rights all year round (not just on IWD)

By Charlie Sawyer

Acid attacks have risen by 45% in London in just a year. Women are now also at greater risk

By Charlie Sawyer

Actor Jamie Dornan guiltily admits to stalking women in London. Here’s why

By Abby Amoakuh

MAGA-themed fashion show goes viral as netizens discover it’s not a joke

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Woman who protested hijab law in Iran by stripping in public has disappeared after violent arrest

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Bad Bunny’s album is a love letter to the iconic white plastic chair at family gatherings

By Charlie Sawyer

Young men are turning to testosterone boosters in new TikTok trend linked to right-wing rhetoric

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

ICE jacket sales soar on Amazon, fuelling fears of immigration agent impersonation

By Charlie Sawyer

Republican Rep says he’d force his daughter to carry pregnancy from rape

By Abby Amoakuh

Mikey Madison tells Pamela Anderson why she rejected an intimacy coordinator on Anora set

By Abby Amoakuh

Influencer Sophie Guidolin slammed for Miranda Priestly-style job ad for personal assistant

By Abby Amoakuh

Why TikTok’s The Substance trend comparing celebrities of different ages misses the movie’s point

By Charlie Sawyer

Are Gal Gadot and Rachel Zegler feuding? Rumours swirl following Oscars 2025

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Mark Zuckerberg criticised as Meta allegedly censors abortion pill providers, raising Trump alliance fears

By Charlie Sawyer

Why are family vloggers fleeing LA? TikTok theory links exodus to California’s new child labour laws

By Charlie Sawyer

Is the sex work industry unfeminist? TikTok thinks so, and so do I

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

South Carolina death row inmate who requested firing squad execution scheduled for 1 November

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

What’s Dior bags got to do with the Delta plane crash? Unpacking the wildest conspiracy theories about the Toronto flight

By Abby Amoakuh

As the Israel-Hamas war worsens, an Israeli and a Palestinian discuss the prospects for peace

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Channing Tatum and Zoë Kravitz call off their engagement. Is his past divorce to blame?