This morning, on Monday 7 March 2022, Russia announced that it will open “new humanitarian corridors” to Ukrainian civilians trapped under its bombardments without food or water, who have been unable to evacuate their wounded following two days of failed ceasefires in the besieged city of Mariupol. But, plot twist, Russia’s defence ministry further revealed that the corridor from Kyiv would lead to Belarus while civilians from Kharkiv would be permitted to go only to Russia. Russia would also mount an airlift to take Ukrainians from Kyiv to Russia, the ministry added.
The move has already been heavily criticised, with a spokesperson for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky calling the strategy “completely immoral” and stating that Russia is trying to “use people’s suffering to create a television picture,” as initially reported by Reuters.
Meanwhile in Russia on Friday 4 March, citizens were presented with a ban against the promotion of any kind of information that has not been relayed by the government first and foremost. Since the beginning of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the former’s officials have said that false information has been spread by enemies such as the US and its Western European allies in an attempt to sow discord among its citizens.
What’s really happening is that, until now, global news media had been reporting honestly on the situation, something that the Kremlin did not appreciate since it never planned to inform its people on exactly where soldiers were sent to die and what for. Instead, Russia has been calling real coverage of the events “fake news,” and is now threatening anyone willing to speak out about such happenings of being sent to prison for up to 15 years. Talk about some 1984-esque censorship and brainwashing, huh?
Russian lawmakers also imposed fines on anyone calling for sanctions against Russia following the invasion of Ukraine. BBC Director General Tim Davie said the new legislation appeared to criminalise the process of independent journalism. “It leaves us no other option than to temporarily suspend the work of all BBC News journalists and their support staff within the Russian Federation while we assess the full implications of this unwelcome development,” he said in a statement.
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC)—the country’s public broadcaster—said it had temporarily suspended reporting from the ground in Russia so it could seek clarity on the new law. ABC News also said it would pause broadcasting from the country as it assessed the situation. The Washington Post, Dow Jones and Reuters said they were evaluating the new media law and the situation. You get the idea.
Leading video-sharing app TikTok has now suspended both live-streaming and new content from Russia in response to the country’s ‘fake news’ law.
1/ TikTok is an outlet for creativity and entertainment that can provide a source of relief and human connection during a time of war when people are facing immense tragedy and isolation. However, the safety of our employees and our users remain our highest priority.
TikTok has also begun applying labels to content from some state-controlled media accounts. On the platform, content from outlets such as RT—a Russian state-controlled international television network funded by the tax budget of the Russian government—now includes a label at the bottom of the video that reads “Russia state-controlled media,” with a link to more information.
Russia’s internet censorship agency, Roskomnadzor, announced plans to block access to Facebook around the country on Friday 4 March, in turn shutting it from promoting the free flow of information—while blaming the company’s restrictions on Russian state media. Putin’s new law could have a spiralling impact on the tech industry, pressuring companies to stop operating in the region completely, without the Russian government itself having to actively block any particular social media service.
The horrors surrounding the Russian invasion of Ukraine are hard to miss—as the tragedies rise, so do the views on TikTok videos. Amid the trauma of this war comes a form of ‘warcore’ content we have never experienced before. Beginning as a defining term for a fashion trend, it appears that the aestheticisation of war now comes in video format.
Fashion’s problematic warcore movement
Initially coined by Vogueas a response to the menswear shows of 2019, ‘warcore’ was used as a term to describe fashion’s reaction, or perhaps reflection, of the events of the wider world. In the midst of a year that had the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, a deepening humanitarian crisis in Yemen, a worsening Trump presidency, a global #Metoo movement and troubling climate change impact, it’s safe to say there was a lot going on—and fashion followed suit.
“Arguably, this strain of warcore clothing is reflective of the violence, chaos, and widespread anxiety in the world at large. Athleisure, gorpcore, workwear and streetwear are all obvious antecedents, what’s new is the sense of survivalism,” Vogue writer Steff Yotka explained. With such a statement, one must wonder who such ‘survivalism’ is for. Fashion’s ‘reflection’ of the times may actually just be a co-option of a struggle and an aestheticisation of war.
In 2019, Troy Patterson wrote about the trend in The New Yorker where he pointed to the 1996 work of critic Suzy Menkes in The New York Times in which she noted “the linkage of fashion with war [as] problematic” and suggested that the industry’s “raiding of blood-soaked references” may appear “crassly exploitative.” Such analysis can be applicable beyond the realm of warcore fashion into the current cultural reactions to war, or more accurately the Russian invasion of Ukraine, online. It is where performative activism, an obsession with graphic content and ‘aesthetic’ converge to create a TikTok-like warcore.
Patterson’s words ring as true today as they did in 2019, “Now, in a time of endless war, heedless consumption, and great social stratification, all bets are off.”
The rise of video warcore on TikTok
SCREENSHOT spoke to one Ukrainian citizen on the day the current immediate offence began—24 February—and revealed her views on the sinister “reality show” element of the war on her people. “The last two weeks became especially tensive. People are different all over the world so there were diverse reactions to the situation,” she said. At the time,she went on to share that she felt “doomed” by the situation, wishing for more to be done to help the country.
“I feel like the whole world is watching, empathising and can’t do anything. It reminds me of times when everyone was watching Squid Game. We are like the next reality show to people.”
And a reality show it seems to be. In the strange dystopian-like world we live in, the biggest war to hit a European nation since World War II is being watched on TikTok. This is, of course, not the first time social media has been used in times of war; made clear by writer Gugulethu Khumalo for SCREENSHOT in her piece Following the Tigray genocide, here’s how the African youth is redefining politics on TikTok, both TikTok’s role in Africa and Facebook’s use in the Arab Spring were citied. The arguments of social media’s positive use in spreading information to the masses are without doubt valid and true—it helps cut through the censorship of some major news organisations or governments to show people evident on-the-ground reality. However, what is surfacing today has become a little more than just that.
The ‘aesthetics’ of war have reached beyond the menial realms of clothing and have developed into a deeply intriguing, as well as ultimately tragic, cultural phenomenon online. Away from the typical content we have witnessed surface among times of war on social media comes a movement that edits gruelling, painfully traumatic and violent moments into music dominated, short trailers of sorts.
Perhaps made with good intention at heart, and possibly even a motivating or encouraging element for those affected by the horrors of this invasion, such clips fit the bill. It is a strange part of the emotional discourse online that rightly aims to spread as much support for Ukraine as possible, however, there is something insidious to be said about individuals editing real horrific events into a punchy montage.
These are real Ukrainians with real trauma who are having their lives movie-fied for likes into a, much like SCREENSHOT’s Ukrainian source cited, Squid Game–like “reality show.” Speaking of Squid Game, in an article by Jack Ramage titled Why are we all so damn obsessed with death game TV?which seeks to address the immense popularity of the genre, the writer largely explained that there is very little research out there to better understand such phenomena but stated “horror can be a satisfying experience of ‘unrealism’—the enjoyment of knowing, for a fact, that it’s all fake anyway.”
This time, however, it’s not fake, it’s real. But it appears that large pools of social media users have yet to understand this. Users have been using footage from other crises, like that of a Palestinian girl, and wrongfully labelled it as being from Ukraine—with nearly a million likes on the video, that is cause for some serious concern. Instead, TikTok users have turned legitimate blood-shed into a romanticised Call of Duty–like (COD) game they play on TikTok with the ‘Ghost of Kyiv’ as their choice player.
It is ironic that I wrote such a statement alluding to COD before stumbling upon a comment on the above video, with over 30,000 likes, that writes, “There is no way this doesn’t become a COD mission.” Yes, that’s a real comment.
Our society’s worrying infatuation with being an observer to murder, war and violence has perhaps played its role in our overall desensitisation to war itself and its impact on human beings—especially for those of colour, in the Middle East and Africa, whose similar experiences with war are not met with the same support, empathy or respect.
Not to mention there are real dangers in finding yourself immersed in the warcore side of the internet. It’s not just those well-meaning videos aiming to share the news or rightly advocate for Ukraine and its freedom, others with ulterior motives have access to such tools too. Reports have surfaced that Russian powers are also pushing their own tactics in this ‘digital war’ by using fake Ukrainian social media profiles to promote its propaganda. Despite some pushback from social media platforms that have aimed to block Russian activity, these trailer-filled trenches online run deep.
