Chemotherapy-induced hair loss might soon become a thing of the past, thanks to Luminate Medical – Screen Shot
Deep Dives Level Up Newsletters Saved Articles Challenges

Chemotherapy-induced hair loss might soon become a thing of the past, thanks to Luminate Medical

Hair loss is one of the most recognisable side effects of chemotherapy affecting millions of cancer patients annually. With 47 per cent of female patients considering hair loss to be the most traumatic aspect of chemotherapy and 8 per cent of them declining the entire treatment for fear of hair loss, Luminate Medical is dedicating itself to provide a patient-focused alternative—thereby uprooting all visible connections of the side effect from the treatment.

Co-founded by Aaron Hannon and Doctor Bárbara Oliveira, Luminate Medical’s groundbreaking venture (dubbed LILY) is a wearable device that will use electrical stimulation to curb the visible side effect. When a patient undergoes chemotherapy, the cancer-inhibiting drugs courses through their entire body—travelling absolutely everywhere blood does. This, in turn, results in a variety of side effects like weakness and nausea, along with significant hair loss when the substances affect follicles in the long run. Developed in collaboration with the Translational Medical Device Lab at the National University of Ireland, Galway, Luminate Medical’s solution is to prevent blood from reaching those cells in the first place.

The portable device works as a mechanised compression garment for the head using soft materials to achieve the pressure. According to Hannon, the device is therefore comfortable with the pressure being carefully monitored. There’s also no risk of damage from the lack of blood flow in those cells.

“Compression therapy has been really well studied,” he said in an interview with TechCrunch. “There are years of literature around how long you can apply these therapies without damaging the cells. There’s a certain amount of mechanical engineering involved in making it both comfortable and effective.”

Patients are required to wear the cap during and after the entire chemo session. By restricting blood flow to the skin of the scalp, the novel device facilitates the flow of the drugs to the intended tumor or cancer site while saving hair follicles from damage. To date, Luminate Medical has performed animal trials—which saw strong hair retention of around 80 per cent with no adverse effects. Although full-fledged human trials require more time and approval to set up, initial tests of the wearable devices’ effects on healthy patients have proven to work exactly as expected on humans.

“We’re really excited about the efficacy of this therapy because it works with lots of hair types,” Hannon said—highlighting inclusivity as an important yet underestimated factor when it comes to innovations in healthcare. The company also backs the belief that no patient should have to compromise their identity to get the best available medical treatment. “Luminate Medical recognises that hair is an essential element of personality and self-esteem, and is dedicated to using the latest advances in medical technology to protect this,” the company website reads.

When it comes to competition, Hannon noted the presence of new treatments that cool the scalp instead of compressing it. However, the CEO added how patients predominantly engage in the purchase of wigs to counter the side effect. Given the fact that wigs are covered and hair loss is considered a medical condition by many insurance companies and other methods of reimbursement, TechCrunch noted how it will take time and evidence to get the device approved for those processes.

The team, however, is confident that the solution—valued at around $1,500—is within the means of many as long as other costs are being picked up by insurance coverage. After all, people spend fortunes on wigs and other hair retention products and methods. Who wouldn’t prefer prevention over cure in the first place? Luminate Medical is also seeking to offer the benefits of the device to those who can’t afford the cost out of pocket—therefore progressing toward FDA approval and a US launch with Europe and others to come. At the moment, the team is focused on getting the device into the hands (and onto the heads) of its first set of patients.

Racism in healthcare: review finds pulse oxygen monitors may be less accurate on darker skin

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the sales of at-home pulse oximeters have skyrocketed with The New York Times calling the device the “personal tech gadget of 2020.” Although their use has been and is vital, both in healthcare settings and otherwise, there seems to be a recurring issue—they might not work well on darker skin. So how does it work?

A pulse oxygen monitor is a small, non-invasive device that is most commonly attached to your finger. It works by measuring oxygen levels through “small beams of light [that] pass through the blood in the finger.” Along with informing you about your heart rate, the levels of oxygen are then calculated by measuring any changes of “light absorption in oxygenated or deoxygenated blood.”

The idea that pulse oxygen monitors may be less effective on those with darker skin has been a topic of discussion throughout the pandemic around the world—with numerous studies conducted in the US confirming this theory. Now medical experts in the UK are issuing the same warning.

A rapid review of the devices’ effectiveness on black, Asian and minority ethnic peoples was carried out by the NHS Race and Health Observatory and published in April 2021. The review noted that the devices were developed and studied on white and light-skinned individuals and that the general symptoms associated with low oxygen levels—paleness or going ‘blue’—may not be applicable to those with darker skin.

The UK review also cited how “analysis from a recent 2020 Michigan University study found pulse oximeter readings of blood oxygen levels were three times more likely to be inaccurate among African-American patients.” Director of the NHS Race and Health Observatory, Dr Habib Naqvi told the BBC, “It’s an aspect of the sort of systemic biases and systemic racism that occur in the NHS and the care that we provide in the NHS every day.”

The dangerous consequence of this device’s limitations is that it could possibly overestimate oxygen levels in people with darker skin, as reported by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and NHS England.

This is another blow for patients from minority backgrounds, who have already discovered throughout the pandemic that people of colour in the UK and around the world—due a number of factors—have been disproportionately affected by the virus. It is this fact that has led to calls for the device’s limitations to be advertised—with some experts actually citing it as a possible contributing factor to the high mortality rates in black and ethnic minority patients.

The BBC has reported that NHS England is now updating their guidance on the use of this device—advising patients of colour to continue using pulse oxygen monitors but should be used alongside a healthcare professional’s advice. The NHS website also reads that people of colour should still use the device to measure their levels, By looking at changes in readings rather than just one reading, it means that even if an oximeter is not completely accurate, it is still possible to see if oxygen levels are going down.”

They cited the limitations of the device on darker skin and pledged that “NHS England and NHS Improvement are keeping this situation under review and the National Institute for Health Research has been asked to support further research so that we can understand more about how this may apply to people with darker skin who have COVID-19 and are using pulse oximetry.”

This is yet another reminder of the systemic racism that is deeply embedded into the institutions of our society and a call for more racially-inclusive research in the healthcare equipment industry.