Software engineers scam Reddit users with AI-generated nudes in new social experiment

By Charlie Sawyer

Published Apr 19, 2023 at 12:14 PM

Reading time: 2 minutes

43273

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become intrinsically linked to the ways in which we now navigate the modern world. Whether it’s diagnosing medical conditions or stealing our jobs, technology has officially managed to seep its way into every facet of our lives. Most recently, AI was utilised by a group of software engineers to conduct a highly questionable, if not intriguing, social experiment.

According to news outlet Firstpost, two individuals decided to take it upon themselves to trick a cohort of unassuming Redditors into paying for nudes of a “beautiful woman.” The only catch? The photos they received were not from an actual woman, rather, they were from a computer-generated woman named Claudia.

Reddit happens to be a platform which can often attract some of the seediest netizens online, and so it’s no wonder that the engineers were able to find a number of people more than willing to splash the cash in hopes of receiving some nude pictures.

As reported by Firstpost, the two men behind the scheme were able to make up to $100 selling sensitive images of Claudia. One paying customer even tried to invite the AI-generated woman on a date, alleging that he earned six figures and could show her a good time…

The pair used a computer program called ​​Stable Diffusion to create Claudia and instructed the software to construct a woman taking a selfie “without makeup, with black hair, shoulder length hair, plain background, straight hair and hair fringe.”

It should also be noted that while it’s unknown if the engineers specified an age, the AI did create a woman who looked remarkably young—something that makes the entire experiment feel that bit more unsavoury.

Are AI-generated nudes a good thing or a bad thing?

In many ways, this event accurately reflects the lengths in which some individuals will go to in order to try and obtain nude photos of women online. And while sex workers are of course fully entitled to sell images of themselves, this particular method was unregulated and therefore can lead to a number of ethical issues, regardless of whether or not the woman in question is real or computer-generated.

For one thing, Stable Diffusion is freely available to the public, and while the company states that users are forbidden to create “obscene, vulgar, lascivious, offensive and pornographic” pictures, it’s completely impossible to keep track of everyone who has access to the site. It’s an upsetting yet sure thing that predators have utilised the technology to create disturbing images, and most likely share them on with other criminals online.

There’s also an argument to be made that the use of AI-generated nudes, and indeed the future idea of completely AI-generated porn, takes direct business and profit away from sex workers.

However, we know that young women can be subject to extreme exploitation online, whether it be someone deepfaking your face onto a nude image, or being the victim of revenge porn. This begs the question, could fully AI-generated nudes lessen the need for individuals to take advantage of real human beings?

Now, this is an incredibly multi-layered story, and one that’s created a number of divisive debates online. Global video content publisher Brut recently shared a clip on its Instagram discussing the experiment, and users definitely had a lot to say in the comments section.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Brut AI (@brut.ai)

One netizen wrote: “I don’t see the problem with AI-generated nudes. It beats the continued exploitation and trafficking of women,” while another noted: “If you think this fake ass looking person is real you deserve to get scammed I’m so sorry.”

It’s a complicated topic with a number of matters to address. The development of technology has always gone hand in hand with global ethical dilemmas, and this is only one clear example of it playing out in real life. Whether or not you agree with the engineers’ experiment, it’s definitely spurred on a conversation that needs to be had.

Keep On Reading

By Charlie Sawyer

What does Brazil’s X ban mean for Elon Musk and his fellow tech bros?

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

From Kardashian curves to slimmer figures, personal trainer reveals the latest fitness trend

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Trump-appointed judge faces backlash over viral video exposing her opinions on dwarf tossing

By Charlie Sawyer

How Kat Torres went from wellness guru dating Leonardo DiCaprio to human trafficking convict

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

From Beast Games mistreatment to resurfaced racist comments, is MrBeast finally getting cancelled?

By Abby Amoakuh

Woman sues her boyfriend after he decides not to take her to the airport

By J'Nae Phillips

Why Gen Z still turn to nature and the great outdoors for fashion inspo years after gorpcore’s rise

By Abby Amoakuh

Andrew Garfield is dating a professional witch and the internet can’t handle it

By Charlie Sawyer

Debunking 3 of the Republicans’ most pathetic insults about VP candidate Tim Walz

By Charlie Sawyer

Nigel Farage says Andrew Tate is an important voice for emasculated young boys

By Abby Amoakuh

Move over Tom Cruise, TikTok blind item hints at Sabrina Carpenter becoming Scientology’s new face

By Abby Amoakuh

Dermatologists accuse Nara Smith of promoting skin cancer with latest homemade sunscreen video

By Fleurine Tideman

Revving my engines: Can women find F1 drivers sexy and simultaneously enjoy the sport?

By Charlie Sawyer

Allegations of sexual assault and dog consumption: a recap of Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s week

By Abby Amoakuh

Donald Trump versus Joe Biden: how will the candidates’ approach to student loans impact votes?

By Charlie Sawyer

What is JoJo Siwa’s net worth? Unpacking the Karma singer’s business empire

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Facebook sperm donations groups are on the rise, and they’re terrifying

By Charlie Sawyer

Mystery girl behind Nigel Farage milkshake saga sparks online theories

By Abby Amoakuh

US hospitals now required to get explicit consent for pelvic exams to combat gynaecological violence

By Charlie Sawyer

Vampire facials at unlicensed New Mexico spa have infected three women with HIV