Okay Facebook, tell us who you think is trustworthy

By Yair Oded

Updated May 16, 2020 at 10:08 AM

Reading time: 2 minutes

310

In an effort to combat cyclones of misinformation and fake news raging across its platform, Facebook has recently taken to assigning credibility scores to their users. According to Tessa Lyons, Facebook’s product manager in charge of targeting and eliminating misinformation, the new campaign consists of algorithms programmed to assess how likely a person is to spread fake news and how credible their flagging of misinformation is. In short, their new mission is to “identify malicious users.” But Facebook’s crusade against evildoers on the web raises a bunch of other concerns regarding how the data is collected, how precisely it will be utilised, and—most importantly—the legitimacy of their authority to determine what constitutes “trustworthy” activity.

On their part, Facebook insists that the new scoring method is a highly credible and efficient way to thwart the spreading of fake news on their platform. It replaced a 2015 attempt to tackle misinformation, which allowed users to flag content they believe is suspicious or downright false. Alas, according to Lyons, users often reported content simply because they disagreed with the author’s argument or political affiliation, or when they were personally offended. In order to surpass that problem, Facebook fashioned the sophisticated, algorithm-based method of scoring users in order to screen content reporting and alleviate the pressure from fact-checkers. Lyons insists that the scoring system doesn’t produce an overall score for their users’ reputation and trustworthiness, but rather relies on thousands of factors to identify particular behavioural patterns that are often associated with either spreading misinformation or wrongly flagging content as fake.

Yet, very little is known about what factors and behavioural clues Facebook is considering while assessing a user’s trustworthiness, or what measurements it uses in order to construct a person’s credibility profile. What if, for instance, one once opened a fake account to stalk their ex (an arguably desperate and creepy act that many of us are culpable of, but not necessarily ‘malicious’)? Is their score going to take a nosedive? If so, are a broken heart or lover-withdrawal symptoms any indication of a person’s likelihood to spread fake news or flag content as such for no reason other than they don’t agree with it? It has also been reported that while assessing a user’s trustworthiness, Twitter often looks at the behaviour patterns of other people in their network. In the unimaginable event that Facebook utilises similar tactics, can the actions of one’s boss or classmate or a total rando on their friends’ list affect their score?

One can contemplate countless other potential issues with Facebook’s scoring method. For instance, what assurance do we have that they are not in fact in the process of constructing an overall, comprehensive ‘trustworthiness’ profile of their users? Simply because they told us so? (lol!) And what will become of this data should it end up in the wrong hands or be sold to a third party (such as governments or greedy conglomerates that are ravenous for such delicious information)? In what manner will it be utilised?

Unfortunately, our experience with Facebook and its tech siblings shows us that we simply don’t know what occurs behind closed doors and that we have no real way of monitoring or making a well-informed criticism of its actions and objectives until it’s too late.

But the problem, in this case, runs far deeper than that. Perhaps it all boils down to the agency we entrust to such platforms to determine what is ‘trustworthy’. Perhaps we are too quick to believe that companies that are ultimately motivated by their own interests (which often contrast those of the public) are legitimate judges when it comes to the assessment of credibility and morality… and character.

Keep On Reading

By Charlie Sawyer

Penn Badgley praised for opening up about fatherhood and raising sons on Call Her Daddy

By Alma Fabiani

The disturbing TikTok trend sexualising fake Down syndrome faces using AI filters

By Eliza Frost

Everything to know about Justin Lee Fisher, arrested at Travis Kelce’s home over Taylor Swift deposition papers from Justin Baldoni

By Charlie Sawyer

How influencer Liv Schmidt promotes toxic eating habits through the Skinni Société 

By Charlie Sawyer

Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz Beckham hire a lawyer to battle misinformation amid growing family rift

By Abby Amoakuh

You star Madeline Brewer faces misogynistic backlash after internet brands her character unlikeable

By Eliza Frost

The Life of a Showgirl or The Life of a Tradwife? Unpicking Taylor Swift’s new album

By Eliza Frost

Netflix’s new Trainwreck documentary exposes the rise and scandalous fall of American Apparel

By Charlie Sawyer

What is Mar-a-Lago face? Unpacking the beauty trend prompted by Donald Trump’s second term

By Eliza Frost

The swag gap relationship: Does it work when one partner is cooler than the other?

By Eliza Frost

Bad Bunny is not touring the US due to fear of ICE raids at concerts

By Charlie Sawyer

Will Greta Thunberg reach Gaza safely amid Israel’s aid blockade?

By Eliza Frost

Controversial American Apparel owner just opened LA Apparel in NYC and TikTok girlies are flocking to shop

By Eliza Frost

How exactly is the UK government’s Online Safety Act keeping young people safe? 

By Eliza Frost

Jennifer Aniston to star in Apple TV+ adaptation of Jennette McCurdy’s memoir I’m Glad My Mom Died

By Charlie Sawyer

Father of former Harry Potter star gives serious warning to the new child stars in HBO Max reboot

By Charlie Sawyer

First look at $1 billion UK mini city where controversial HBO Harry Potter series will be filmed

By Charlie Sawyer

Call Her Daddy host Alex Cooper accuses former soccer coach of sexual harassment in new docuseries

By Eliza Frost

How to spot a performative male out in the wild 

By Eliza Frost

Cruz Beckham’s girlfriend Jackie Apostel defends the couple’s age gap relationship