Everything wrong with the clickbait headlines covering Prince Harry’s memoir Spare

By Annabel Preston

Updated May 31, 2023 at 01:23 PM

Reading time: 3 minutes

On his odyssey from Oprah to book publisher Random House, there is no question that Prince Harry has royally stirred up the world. With revelations branching from losing his virginity to the tragic loss of his mother, his recollections have certainly shed light upon how the Duke of Sussex has coped—and not coped—with the traumas of his younger years. Nevertheless, anyone who remembers the death of Princess Diana will invariably be aware of the press’ involvement. Similarly, anyone who knows of Prince Harry will also be conscious of his wilder years as a youngster. So why did these emotive elaborations warrant such widespread press attention? In short, they didn’t.

The hysteria and intrigue surrounding Prince Harry and his childhood is inexhaustible and, more often than not, gratuitous. Throughout his royal rampage, the Duke has made it clear his case is primarily with the British press. Well Harry you have, albeit inadvertently, hit the nail on the head.

When those explosive pages of Prince Harry’s memoir Spare were leaked only a couple of days ago, the world’s media scene was enveloped in a dark PR smog making it almost impossible to establish even clues towards the whole truth. As soon as the pages became public property, Harry’s forthright confessions about his life in the military were instantly blasted across the UK’s front pages. From tabloids to broadsheets, on 5 January 2023, you would be hard-pushed to miss a headline exclaiming that Prince Harry had killed 25 Taliban fighters while stationed in Afghanistan. Security and protocol concerns aside, the fact that he had admitted to treating his victims as “chess pieces” was enough to trigger an international media frenzy.

One week later, 20 people were killed in Afghanistan after a suspected suicide bomber detonated outside the foreign ministry in Kabul. This was documented, to be sure, but the tragedy’s press coverage and interest was a drop in the ocean compared to Harry’s bygone musings. This exposed the crux of the issue with our media in Britain—without undermining the significance of his revelation, Prince Harry’s personal confession of an occupational inevitability should not eclipse 20 deaths and the very real social struggles happening today.

It’s not just the coverage of Spare that has demonstrated this fundamental flaw in the British press. From live feeds to breaking news, the notorious Netflix documentary Harry & Meghan was a force to be reckoned in the newsroom. For two weeks, the public were subjected to a torrent of Sussex sensationalism.

In the second round of episodes, we learned of Meghan Markle’s miscarriage—a horrendous experience that tragically affects one in eight people who know they are pregnant. This could have been an exceptional opportunity to give a voice to the countless women who have experienced similar grief. Yet, true to form, Prince Harry related it to the exceptional, and unrelatable, aspect of their life by blaming the press… And the next day it was on our front pages.

Meanwhile, in Idaho, US, a woman was posting about her miscarriage on TikTok. The 35-year-old actively miscarried for what turned out to be a full 19 days. She said she hoped sharing her ordeal with people could inspire changes in the restrictive abortion laws. Again, this does not undercut the definite tragedy of Harry and Meghan’s loss. But we should be asking ourselves what right they have to a media explosion while the women of Idaho have to use TikTok to communicate the potentially fatal danger they have been in since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

Of course, it would be naive to pretend any news involving the royal family isn’t going to cause a stir. They are, without a doubt, some of the most famous (and infamous) figures on the global stage. Their ‘never complain, never explain’ philosophy only works in the first place because they’re very much aware of this. So it is unsurprising that when something as scandalous as the release of a tell-all memoir from a rogue royal occurs, there is colossal interest. But that is yesterday’s news.

Harry and Meghan officially exited the royal family in 2020 and we have been kept regularly informed of the ongoing malcontent. Should the book have been the first hint of Harry’s criticism and general unhappiness, then the extensive reporting may have been justified. Or, perhaps if Harry was wilfully offering hard evidence of institutional racism or PR abuse, there would be a just cause for the country’s outcry. But, as a fundamental part of a nation’s constitution, familial quarrels are unlikely to hold any weight in our decision to back them. So how can we possibly rationalise the way we have chosen to cover them?

This case of the chicken and the egg is a cycle that has to be broken before it breaks our news. To retain relevance and respectability, both qualities must be woven into the fabric of each and every headline we read. On the flip side, we must start actively thinking about the type of news we are consuming and, crucially, whether it has earned its airtime. For now, general preconceptions of gossip and sensationalism are largely confined to the tabloids. But if our media’s response to Prince Harry’s recent exposé is anything to go by, we are in very real danger of slipping irrevocably from truth-tellers to click-baiters.

Keep On Reading

By Charlie Sawyer

Timothée Chalamet’s dating history proves that Kylie Jenner has always been next on his list

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

US mother received call from kidnapped daughter only to find out it was an AI scam

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

NFL star Michael Oher, inspiration for The Blind Side, sues Tuohy family for deceptive adoption   

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

90% of UK female surgeons have witnessed sexual misconduct in the last 5 years, new report shows

By Charlie Sawyer

The Mean Girls musical reboot trailer just dropped and it’s giving gen Z tryhard energy

By Charlie Sawyer

Israel protests: Why millions fear the country is close to becoming a dictatorship

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

MrBeast accused of bullying after he sues his own fast food chain MrBeast Burger

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

French riots following fatal police shooting of Nahel Merzouk tear both his family and country apart

By Charlie Sawyer

Meet Vivek Ramaswamy, a Trump 2.0 and the first millennial Republican presidential candidate

By Charlie Sawyer

Acid attacks have risen by 45% in London in just a year. Women are now also at greater risk

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Explicit 18+ flyers of Democrat Susanna Gibson sent to voters in a sexist Republican smear campaign

By Charlie Sawyer

McDonald’s, Chick-fil-A, and Starbucks: Getting involved in political conflict is just a fast food thing

By Mason Berlinka

What is EA FC 24 and why did it abandon its popular collaboration with FIFA?

By Mason Berlinka

Watch video of Sleepy Joe Biden confuse the war in Ukraine with the US invasion of Iraq

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

French riots fuel far-right National Rally’s march into the mainstream. Why is no one reporting on it?

By Charlie Sawyer

Who is Tommy Robinson, the far-right anti-Islam activist who was arrested at London’s anti-Semitism march?

By Charlie Sawyer

TikToker reveals the underwhelming food served at the White House Pride event

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Dirty, 30 and thriving: Gen Z’s unconventional guide to adulting

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

With the US football team out of the Women’s World Cup, who will now snatch the trophy?

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

TikToker Victoria Paris slammed for comments about Paris bed bugs epidemic